View source for AMO:Editors/MeetingNotes

== AMO Editors Meeting Details ==
<pre>For now tentatively done every month,
1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) or 1-650-215-1282 or 1-650-903-0800
Conferencing Center: x92
Conference ID: 398
Additional discussion at #addons (irc.mozilla.org)</pre>
__TOC__

== November 28  ==
* Topics
** State of the queues. [https://forums.addons.mozilla.org/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=247 The latest report].
** Editor contractors from Appcoast.
** Trusted add-on cleanup. [http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2009/11/26/Grrrr One public reaction].
** Usage of "Gmail" in German locales. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513252 Bug 513252]
** Review process redesign suspended.
** Revisit suggestions from previous meetings.
* Attendees
** Jorge Villalobos (Mozilla)
** Mario Alvarado (Mozilla)
** Andrew Williamson
** Andreas Wagner
** Shivanand Sharma
** Adarsh TP
* AMO Editor wiki update -> Jorge
* Editors should know which add-ons are trusted. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531866 Bug 531866]
* Enforce a strong password policy in AMO. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531868 Bug 531868]
* Improve sorting in queues to avoid penalizing authors that frequently update. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531875 Bug 531875]
* Follow up on namespacing code validation -> clouserw
* Look for ways to improve editor motivation and retention.
* Allow AMO Editors to edit the [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/pages/validation validation tool page]. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531880 Bug 531880]
* Use https://preview.addons.mozilla.org/ for testing.
* Need an AMO change log (with bug links).
* Improve the review commenting system. It should be possible to comment on a version, and have a comments flag. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531887 Bug 531887]
* Create information request flag (answered and unanswered). [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531889 Bug 531889]
* Create RSS feed for queues. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531893 Bug 531893]
* Include test steps as part of nomination requirements. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531901 Bug 531901]
* Improve context for authors to reply to editors:
** I think it would be a good idea to modify the text of the notifications so that authors know how to properly follow up on any rejections. Something like "please reply to this message and make sure this e-mail is fully quoted". [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531905 Bug 531905]
** Maybe include editor name in subject. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531906 Bug 531906]
* Allow editors to search for already done add-on reviews [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531910 Bug 531910]

== September 26  ==

*Attendees 
**Nick Nguyen (Mozilla) 
**Jorge Villalobos (Mozilla) 
**Rey Bango (Mozilla) 
**Zadkiel 
**Andrew Williamson 
**Andreas Wagner 
**Adam Green 
**Teun van Eijsden 
**Shivanand Sharma 
**Archaeopteryx

*Queue status and new editor weekly report. 
**Editor focus on nominations is working well. 
**Focus back on updates eventually. Rey: rotating queues schedules for editors in order to distribute work properly. 
**Bring super-review escalation to a minimum.

*Review process redesign overview. http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcxw3w5k_25hn9nd8vg

*Suggestions from editors on how to improve the system. 
**Request more descriptive information from authors, specially regarding expected behavior 
**<strike>Screenshots showing differences in add-on.</strike>
**Allow uploading updates when in nomination queue without bumping the add-on to the back of the line. 
**Improve validation tools to detect lack of namespacing. 
**Diff for nominations https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498072 
**<strike>Separating themes and search engines from main queues.</strike> Rey: you can sort the queues by type in the editor tools. 
**<strike>More editors.</strike>
**Make the validation tool more verbose about its flags. 
**Author checklist before submission. 
**Inspire Confidence in new editors 
**<strike>Categorize the addons queue by the level of expertise required for reviews</strike>
**<strike>Queue rotation. Monthly / bi-monthly.</strike>
**<strike>Sandbox after info request and no response? 1 week, maybe?</strike> 
**Add-on update/nomination feed. 
**Editor comments -&gt; not used much 
**<strike>Private editor mailing list.</strike>

*Feedback on call -&gt; very good. The meeting was long and very productive, but the frequency shouldn't be too high to prevent having the meetings become meaningless.