canmove, Confirmed users
1,953
edits
MDN/Archives/Logo: Difference between revisions
m
Jswisher moved page MDN/Logo to MDN/Archives/Logo
m (Jswisher moved page MDN/Logo to MDN/Archives/Logo) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== SNO Concepts Round 1 Feedback (2/3 - 2/4) == | == SNO Concepts Round 1 Feedback (2/3 - 2/4) == | ||
* Jay's feedback (favorites in bold) | |||
== Arun's Feedback == | |||
* Comp1: Meh | |||
* Comp2: Wow, there's something here. The angles are a little intimidating, but it shows a lot of promise. | |||
* Comp3: Too generic, and too bland. | |||
* Comp4: No! | |||
* Comp5: I like this second best, second only to Comp2. | |||
* Comp6: No! | |||
* Comp7: No! | |||
* Comp8: No! | |||
== Jay's feedback (favorites in bold) == | |||
** '''Comp 1: Flame''' | ** '''Comp 1: Flame''' | ||
*** I think of "igniting innovation" | *** I think of "igniting innovation" | ||
| Line 14: | Line 26: | ||
** '''Comp 2: Robo Dino''' | ** '''Comp 2: Robo Dino''' | ||
*** Typeface doesn't seem to fit, it feels too much like the QMO logo font | *** Typeface doesn't seem to fit, it feels too much like the QMO logo font | ||
*** Dino looks cool, but not sure about the wrench in the mouth... feels a bit cheesy | *** Dino looks cool, but not sure about the wrench in the mouth... feels a bit cheesy, but it might grow on me. | ||
*** If we do go with the Robo Dino, it will be nice to have a more accurate conversion from the Mozilla Dino head | *** If we do go with the Robo Dino, it will be nice to have a more accurate conversion from the Mozilla Dino head or at least a more simple version that really stands out. | ||
** '''Comp 3: Pixelated''' | ** '''Comp 3: Pixelated''' | ||
*** I like the concept, but think it needs to be polished a bit more. | *** I like the concept, but think it needs to be polished a bit more. | ||
| Line 43: | Line 55: | ||
*** Don't get the atom concept, so looking forward to hearing the designers rationale | *** Don't get the atom concept, so looking forward to hearing the designers rationale | ||
== Gen's feedback (favorites in bold) == | |||
== | * Comp 1: Flame | ||
** Unclear to me what the flame represents with respect to programming or developers. | |||
* '''Comp 2: Robo Dino''' | |||
** I like the robo dino but don't like the fonts of the MDN much. If we went with this, I'd like to see if the robo dino could be simplified a bit more to make it even more iconic. And a different font. Not sure I can explain what I don't like about it per se- it's just not memorable. | |||
* Comp 3: Pixelated | |||
** I get the idea, and it's cute in a way, but it's also kinda obscure and legibility is poor. Not what I would go with. | |||
* Comp 4: Eye | |||
** Unclear to me what the eye represents. I like this font a bit more than the Robo Dino font. Not what I would go with as it's not immediately clear what this is all about. | |||
* Comp 5: Dino Gears | |||
** If I had to choose, Robo Dino is a bit more compelling for me. I can see the connection with the MDN font here, but maybe its a bit too angular? | |||
* Comp 6: Spidey Sense | |||
** Similar to "Eye" I don't really get it. | |||
* Comp 7: Revolution | |||
** While there are aspects of this iconography that work for me, there are places where this iconography is despised (any Eastern European state that was subjugated by the USSR.) So I think this is actually not appropriate as a global icon as I think it means different things in different places. | |||
* Comp 8: Atom | |||
** Unclear to me. | |||
*** | == Blizzard's Feedback == | ||
* Comp 1: | |||
** Nope, not right. | |||
* Comp 2: | |||
** Like this one the best. Even like the wrench, which someone else thought was cheesy. Echos of the hacks brand, but has the robot feel. (I like robots!) Also, would look damn good on a t-shirt. An important consideration. Downside is that it looks a little different than just about every other logo and site that we have. But maybe that's OK. Fits into the doc system, though, as black on white is probably something we can build on for the general design for the entire developer site + MDN. | |||
* Comp 3: | |||
** Nope. | |||
* Comp 4: | |||
** Save that one for Weave! Or Test Pilot! :) | |||
* Comp 5: | |||
** Neat, but feels a little too out there. Can't tell what it is at first glance. Also, that dino IS A CYLON. | |||
* Comp 6: | |||
** Dude. Wireless. Feels a little bit too much like a set of angel wings. | |||
* Comp 7: | |||
** My second favorite after the dino heads. Very protest / old school banners. Doesn't echo the Mozilla brand well, though. Alternate marks are neat, too. | |||
== Sheppy's Feedback == | |||
* Comp 1: | |||
** The idea is okay here, but it looks like someone's flipping the bird to me. I actually like the font used for "MDN" here but agree it wouldn't scale well. | |||
* '''Comp 2:''' | |||
** This is my favorite. I do like it with the wrench; I might actually like a hammer better though. | |||
** I like that this looks different from our other logos; developer stuff needs to be a little "edgy" IMHO, and this fits the bill. I even like the fonts used here. | |||
** Black & white works well for developer stuff. If we ever want something with a splash of color, could make the eyes glow red. :) | |||
* Comp 3: | |||
** Similar to our current logo but hard to read. | |||
* Comp 4: | |||
** It's staring at me! Make it stop! | |||
* Comp 5: | |||
** Too busy. | |||
* Comp 6: | |||
** Looks too much like the WiFi icon. Or something evil. Or both. | |||
** I do like the typeface used here though. | |||
* Comp 7: | |||
** This one is okay but I've never been big on the "revolution" notion for promoting stuff. | |||
* Comp 8: | |||
** These atoms look like eyes to me, and seems kind of silly anyway. | |||
== Alix's feedback == | |||
* Comp 1: | |||
** No - could be anyone, no clear link to MDN | |||
* Comp 2: | |||
** Favorite one. Like the modularity (have it hold different components of the MDN). Would look awesome on collateral/swag. However, might be too strong for documentation for ex, we would need a lighter version for subpages of MDN b/c I wouldn't want to stare at it all day. | |||
* Comp 3: | |||
** No - could be anyone. | |||
* Comp 4: | |||
** No - feels like the opposite of what we are (feels like "we're watching you" and not "we're open, friendly, welcoming, and here to help"). | |||
* Comp 5: | |||
** No. Too much. | |||
* Comp 6: | |||
** No, feels like the Dharma initiative should use that one, not MDN | |||
* Comp 7: | |||
** Absolutely not. Has negative connotations. | |||
* Comp 8: | |||
** No. Just like the eye, doesn't feel very friendly/welcoming. | |||