Firefox/Content Performance Program/Observations: Difference between revisions

Windows 8 vs Windows 10 (Firefox) - add data
(Memory usage of e10s, non e10s (Firefox and others) - added data)
(Windows 8 vs Windows 10 (Firefox) - add data)
Line 7: Line 7:


==== Experiments ====
==== Experiments ====
===== Windows 8 vs Windows 10 (Firefox) =====
===== Scroll - e10s and Windows 8 / 10 (Firefox) =====
* Performed by: aklotz, avih
* Performed by: aklotz, avih
TBD
* Compare Firefox scrolling performance between Windows 8.1 / 10 and e10s modes, using different power modes, test pages, and tabs
* Tested using the scroll-test bookmarklet from bug {{Bugzilla|894128}} ([https://bug894128.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=776049 this])
* On each config, run the bookmarklet few times and register the result (average and stddev) of a single run which seems typical
* Base configuration:
** System: HP reference laptop, Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 - always connected to power.
** Firefox Nightly 42 2015-08-02 with APZ disabled
** Bookmarklet config: 7000 (ms scroll), 10 (pixels/step), 0 (don't ignore first frames)
* Tested configurations: all the combinations of the following:
** Page: facebook.com/llbean  /  twitter.com/Lord_Voldemort7  /  Yahoo search results ("mozilla")
** OS: Windows 8.1 / Windows 10
** Power mode: balanced / power saver
** Active background tab (gmail while it reloads): Yes / No
* Observations:
** It's really hard to take/get consistent measurements while gmail loads in the bg, due to network latency, gmail load timing, etc.
** Facebook scrolls worse than yahoo/twitter on most configs (except single tab + balanced where the system is fast enough and all pages reach ~60fps)
** Power saver shows consistently worse results than balanced
** No major differences between win8 and 10 across the board
** No major differences between non-e10s and e10s
** Single tab - no major differences between non-e10s/e10s/e10s-multi(3)
** Gmail loading in bg - affects most* configurations badly
*** Except e10s-multi(3) which improves performance on this case dramatically


===== GFX and e10s configurations (Firefox and others) =====
===== GFX and e10s configurations (Firefox and others) =====
Confirmed users
95

edits