Reps/Resources/Analytics/Budget Process Basis Metrics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Konstantina (talk | contribs) (adding budget procedure basis metrics visualization) |
Konstantina (talk | contribs) (fixes) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
On October 2016 we’ve measured with the help of a [https://github.com/MichaelKohler/remo-mean-time-approval script] the average time that it takes for a budget request to be approved. | On October 2016 we’ve measured with the help of a [https://github.com/MichaelKohler/remo-mean-time-approval script] the average time that it takes for a budget request to be approved. | ||
[[File:Screen Shot 2016-11-11 at 16.08.15.png| | [[File:Screen Shot 2016-11-11 at 16.08.15.png|center|Results from the Budget Process Basis Analysis]] | ||
You can find the full results [https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/#/org//reporting/0B8afomu5khGpaVJQbmxGOEs4VXM/page/TQy here] | '''You can find the full results [https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/#/org//reporting/0B8afomu5khGpaVJQbmxGOEs4VXM/page/TQy here]''' | ||
Revision as of 14:23, 11 November 2016
Main | Join | Procedures (SOPs) | Leadership (Resources) | Meetings | Website | FAQ
Overview
On October 2016 we’ve measured with the help of a script the average time that it takes for a budget request to be approved.
You can find the full results here
Our first goal is to bring down the timing for remo-approval which was set on 7.8 days. Our goal is bringing it down to 5.5 days (roughly 30%)
average for remo-approval
That timing was not set based on the average full data rather on the average we saw on the last 12 months. The reasoning behind this decision is the following: By analyzing the data per month, (the pivot tables, charts and data can be found here) we saw a normality for around 2 years back and then an "uphill" with spikes inside the last 12 months. We realised we needed to bring down that number.
That timing was not set based on the average full data rather on the average we saw on the last 12 months. The reasoning behind this decision is the following: By analyzing the data per month, (the pivot tables, charts and data can be found here) we saw a normality for around 2 years back and then an "uphill" with spikes inside the last 12 months. We realised we needed to bring down that number.