Talk:CA/Required or Recommended Practices: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Submission of audit statements== Suggest to add submission of the audit statements in a hard copy to (Insert complete address etc) including the most important details of the CA, a copy...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Suggest to add submission of the audit statements in a hard copy to (Insert complete address etc) including the most important details of the CA, a copy of the CA root(s) and fingerprints signed by the CEO or similar position of the CA.
Suggest to add submission of the audit statements in a hard copy to (Insert complete address etc) including the most important details of the CA, a copy of the CA root(s) and fingerprints signed by the CEO or similar position of the CA.
[[User:Eddyn|Eddyn]] 16:37, 26 November 2007 (PST)
[[User:Eddyn|Eddyn]] 16:37, 26 November 2007 (PST)
==Limitation on validity of server certificates==
Suggest to recommend limitation on validity period for at least server certificates. My recommendation would be to have such certificates valid for one year after which the domain must be revalidated. The maximum period should not exceed 23 month. [[User:Eddyn|Eddyn]] 16:43, 26 November 2007 (PST)

Latest revision as of 09:22, 5 May 2017

Submission of audit statements

Suggest to add submission of the audit statements in a hard copy to (Insert complete address etc) including the most important details of the CA, a copy of the CA root(s) and fingerprints signed by the CEO or similar position of the CA. Eddyn 16:37, 26 November 2007 (PST)

Limitation on validity of server certificates

Suggest to recommend limitation on validity period for at least server certificates. My recommendation would be to have such certificates valid for one year after which the domain must be revalidated. The maximum period should not exceed 23 month. Eddyn 16:43, 26 November 2007 (PST)