HTML/img: Difference between revisions
< HTML
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→alt guidance needs simplification: add more specific URLs) |
(HTML) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome to the Mozilla wiki page on the [[ | Welcome to the Mozilla wiki page on the [[HTML]] <img> element. Please feel free to contribute new test pages or new sections. -- [[User:Tantek|Tantek]] | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* ... | * ... | ||
== img element spec issues == | == img element open spec issues == | ||
=== alt guidance needs simplification === | === alt guidance needs simplification === | ||
Issue recorded on the WHATWG wiki: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Img_Alt | |||
Regarding 4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers | Regarding 4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers | ||
* http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers | * http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers | ||
* http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers | * http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers | ||
The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in | The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in HTML is bad for authors, and for author understanding. | ||
We should remove the last two points in this section: | We should remove the last two points in this section: | ||
| Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80 | See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80 | ||
2010-08-01 posted: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/027479.html | |||
== img element resolved spec issues == | |||
=== reject longdesc === | === reject longdesc === | ||
* [http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Change_Proposal_for_not_including_longdesc reject longdesc attribute] | * [http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Change_Proposal_for_not_including_longdesc reject longdesc attribute] | ||
** 2010-06-26 answered W3C HTML WG survey on related issue 30 | ** 2010-06-26 answered W3C HTML WG survey on related issue 30 | ||
** tweeted: http://tantek.com/2010/177/t4/objecting-longdesc-attr-html5 , http://twitter.com/t/status/17127775107 | ** tweeted: http://tantek.com/2010/177/t4/objecting-longdesc-attr-html5 , http://twitter.com/t/status/17127775107 | ||
Resolved: ding dong longdesc is dead. | |||
* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0112.html | |||
* http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/att-0112/issue-30-decision.html | |||
== see also == | == see also == | ||
* [[ | * [[HTML]] home page | ||
Latest revision as of 07:27, 20 July 2018
Welcome to the Mozilla wiki page on the HTML <img> element. Please feel free to contribute new test pages or new sections. -- Tantek
This article is a stub. You can help MozillaWiki by expanding it.
img element test pages
- ...
img element demo pages
- ...
img element open spec issues
alt guidance needs simplification
Issue recorded on the WHATWG wiki: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Img_Alt
Regarding 4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers
- http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers
- http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers
The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in HTML is bad for authors, and for author understanding.
We should remove the last two points in this section:
- "... document is an e-mail ..." - not a useful case
- meta generator - causes as many problems as it solves
As well as the authoring guidance in the section(s) below:
- Remove: 4.8.1.1.11 An image in an e-mail or private document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images.
See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80
2010-08-01 posted: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/027479.html
img element resolved spec issues
reject longdesc
- reject longdesc attribute
- 2010-06-26 answered W3C HTML WG survey on related issue 30
- tweeted: http://tantek.com/2010/177/t4/objecting-longdesc-attr-html5 , http://twitter.com/t/status/17127775107
Resolved: ding dong longdesc is dead.
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0112.html
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/att-0112/issue-30-decision.html
see also
- HTML home page