Netpolicy: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removed mailing list link and changed the discourse link)
 
(63 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
<section begin=summary />{{RoadmapSummary
=Public policy and advocacy at Mozilla=
|icon=http://www.w3.org/2008/security-ws/papers/images-for-pos-paper/Mozilla-Wordmark.gif
|pagelocation=Netpolicy
|pagetitle=Mozilla Public Policy Module
|owner=Harvey Andersom
|updated=Feb 1, 2013
|description=The Mozilla Public Policy Module works with our community build products that make the Web more robust and take action when the web’s DNA is threatened. Feedback and comments welcome on the [https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/netpolicy Public policy module mailing list]
}}<section end=summary />


==Purpose==
Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.


===What's Mozilla's role in public policy?===
==Activities and Issues==
We maintain a running list of our filings and blog posts by issue, starting with 2014, [[Netpolicy/actions|here.]]


Mozilla believes the Web should be open and available to everyone, and this openness is essential to a healthy cyber economy. We focus on advancing key characteristics of the open Web, not specific functions like social media or videos, which will always be in flux.
The Internet policy issues we engage with fall into two broad pillars of activity: trust and openness.


The strength of the Web and its economy rests on a number of core building blocks that make up its foundational DNA. Think of them as requirements to support a full range of social, business, governmental, and educational interactions and communications that underlie the importance of the Web in our lives today.
===Trust + integrity===
Our work on trust and integrity policy begins with the established external contexts of surveillance reform and privacy, working to develop the values of control, transparency, and privacy. Active issues in this pillar of our work include:
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Surveillance|Surveillance reform]] - touching on a multifaceted set of geographic and legal contexts, and a range of active, unresolved issues
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Cybersecurity|Cybersecurity]] - finding opportunities for change advocacy that go above and beyond information sharing and risk management, including fighting for the continued freedom of users to communicate securely, without backdoors
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Privacy|Privacy]] - continuing leadership on raising public awareness of privacy to build a better, more open Internet future, and evangelizing and advocating for better data privacy policies


When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.
===Openness + innovation===
Our work on openness and innovation includes, but goes beyond, net neutrality and intellectual property, centering around the values of competition, interoperability, and innovation. Active issues in this pillar include:
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Netneutrality|Net neutrality]] - protecting the Internet’s status quo of a level playing field to promote innovation, competition, and user choice
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Copyright|Copyright]] - taking part in U.S. and E.U. conversations with the objective of strengthening fair use and safe harbors for intermediary liability to promote technology innovation
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Patent|Patent]] - supporting process reforms to discourage excessive and anti-innovation litigation, paired with targeted advocacy efforts around software patent scope
* [[Netpolicy/actions#IntGov|Internet governance]] - engaging with ever shifting global Internet governance forums and structures, seeking potential for impact despite glacial pace of change
* [[Netpolicy/actions#Access|Access]] - developing strategies to connect new Internet users to the global open Web, and engaging with telecommunications policy issues as applicable


In terms of regulating the Web, the primary challenge for any legislative process is anticipating unintended consequences, given the complexities inherent in the Web, its architecture, the relationships between its many stakeholders and the pace of innovation.
==Forums==
The primary open forum for Mozilla public policy and Advocacy Community engagement is [https://discourse.mozilla.org/c/advocacy/246 Discourse]. Discourse includes open discussion of policy issues, along with project and job opportunities and other engagements.


'''The Mozilla Public Policy Module works with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and take action when the Web’s DNA is threatened.''' We want to empower anyone to become a steward of the healthy Web and ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2.5 billion people.
We had an mailing list. Historically, this mailing list was the primary place for discussion of policy issues.


===So what do we do?===
==New Ideas==


We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web
If you have an Internet policy issue that you think Mozilla should consider intervening in, please submit it for consideration via our [http://mzl.la/policysupport Policy Support form] or [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/form.ipp Bugzilla]. Please consider the 'Purpose' section below, as well as the issue areas of interest above, in making your submission.
* without compromising core code efforts
* when we can add differential value
* directly or indirectly


===How do we do it?===
==Purpose==


We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:
===What's Mozilla's role in public policy?===
* educate and inform
* organize and convene
* enable and support
* advocate and engage
* code and implement
We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.


=Issues and activities=
Mozilla believes the Web should be open and available to everyone, and this openness is essential to a healthy cyber economy. We focus on advancing key characteristics of the open Web, not specific functions like social media or videos, which will always be in flux.


Possible issues/topics (Feb 2013):
The strength of the Web and its economy rests on a number of core building blocks that make up its foundational DNA. Think of them as requirements to support a full range of social, business, governmental, and educational interactions and communications that underlie the importance of the Web in our lives today.
*Internet Savvy for Policy Makers
*Internet Governance and WCIT
*Patent Reform
*EU Data Directive
*CISPA
*ECPA Reform


Operational issues/tasks:
When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.
*set up form field for submissions [name]
*should we use bugzilla for issue management?  [name]


===Submit New Ideas===
'''Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.''' We want to empower anyone to join us, and become a champion and steward of the healthy Web, to help ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2 billion people who join.


If you have policy issues or topics in this area that you think should be considered or which need support, please submit them here for consideration. [insert link to form]
===So what do we do?===


New Projects Form Field:<br>
We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web:
Activity: [Describe legislative or policy activity]<br>
Goal: [What would success look like?]<br>
Region/Country:<br>
What’s the Impact on the Open Internet?<br>
When: [Describe the timeline or due date]<br>
Submitted by: [optional – for continued updates and discussion, please join the netpolicy mailing list]<br>
Priority: [urgent, needs attention soon,  when you get to it]<br>
Additional Information: [link to articles/websites/organizations]<br>


=Past Activities=
* without compromising core code and product efforts,
* only when Mozilla can add extra value,
* directly or indirectly.


Some of the matters we've worked on or written about in the past:
We aren't a typical lobby shop - not even close. We do have and maintain relationships, and we understand and think about politics. But we focus our engagement on issues, in contexts, and at times where we can dive deep, work strategically, and have outsize impact.


SOPA and ACTA
===How do we do it?===
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/01/17/mozilla-to-join-tomorrows-virtual-protests-of-pipasopa/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/sopa-the-stop-online-piracy-act-is-it-really-dangerous/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/homeland-security-request-to-take-down-mafiaafire-add-on/
*http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121210/06543921321/mozilla-helped-to-stop-sopa-january-now-its-worried-about-wcit.shtml


ITU/WCIT
We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:
*https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ITU/
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2012/12/12/the-tragedy-of-the-itu/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/12/02/why-is-itu-governance-of-the-internet-a-bad-idea/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/11/29/the-itu-and-you/


Net Neutrality
* educate and inform,
*http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703573604574490441027049518.html
* organize and convene,
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/net-neutrality-comments-to-the-fcc/
* enable and support,
* advocate and engage, and
* hack, code and implement.


Browser competition issues
We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2009/08/17/proposed-microsoft-ec-settlement/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/thoughts-on-microsoft%E2%80%99s-settlement-proposal-in-the-european-commission%E2%80%99s-tying-investigation/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/thoughts-on-microsoft%E2%80%99s-settlement-proposal-in-the-european-commission%E2%80%99s-tying-investigation/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/windows-eu-ballot-screen-technical-glitch/
 
DMCA/Copyright/Jailbreaking
*http://www.pcworld.com/article/159822/iphone_jailbreak.html
*https://twitter.com/chefhja/status/201014228293910528
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/comments-supporting-dmca-jailbreaking-exemption/
 
Encryption and open source
*http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/18/234248/mozilla-firefox-not-in-violation-of-us-export-rules
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/recent-changes-in-us-crypto-export-rules/
 
Trust and Privacy
*http://www.ibtimes.com/firefox-maker-mozilla-named-most-trusted-internet-company-privacy-2012-1045844
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/07/03/mozilla-testifies-at-us-senate-commerce-hearing-on-do-not-track/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/category/privacy/
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2009/09/21/keeping-you-and-me-at-the-center-of-things/
 
Do Not Track
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2013/01/28/newdntui/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2012/05/17/do-not-track-gains-more-support-around-the-web/
 
Patent Issues
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/patent-matters-dont-hate-the-player-hate-the-game/
 
 
 
==Meetings and Mailing Lists==
===Mailing List===
 
The public mailing list is here: https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/netpolicy
 
===Meetings===
Planning and module meetings occur on the 3rd Wednesday of each month at 8:45 am PST. Upcoming meeting dates include:
 
* February 20, 2013 - 1145 eastern - [https://etherpad.mozilla.org/ppm-feb20-13 agenda etherpad here]
* March 20, 2013
* April 17, 2013
 
--
 
Vidyo directions:
 
Vidyo room name: PPM
PIN: 3366
First time Vidyo users, please use Guest URL: https://v.mozilla.com/flex.html?roomdirect.html&key=VZ8Q13TbTAVw
 
Audio directions:
 
Audio dial-in: 1-650-903-0800 x92 Conf Number: 98813*3366#
 
===Standing Agenda===


The standard and dial-in details are as follows:
==Join us==


*Status of current projects and progress reports
To learn more about how you can help us take action, visit our [https://advocacy.mozilla.org/ Advocacy] page.
*Review and evaluate new projects/topics
**Understand the issue, context and interests at stake
**Evaluate against mission
**Can Mozilla make an incremental difference. If so how?
**What resources/tactics are available
**Who can we collaborate with?
*Prioritization of activities
*New Topics

Latest revision as of 02:33, 6 May 2022

Public policy and advocacy at Mozilla

Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.

Activities and Issues

We maintain a running list of our filings and blog posts by issue, starting with 2014, here.

The Internet policy issues we engage with fall into two broad pillars of activity: trust and openness.

Trust + integrity

Our work on trust and integrity policy begins with the established external contexts of surveillance reform and privacy, working to develop the values of control, transparency, and privacy. Active issues in this pillar of our work include:

  • Surveillance reform - touching on a multifaceted set of geographic and legal contexts, and a range of active, unresolved issues
  • Cybersecurity - finding opportunities for change advocacy that go above and beyond information sharing and risk management, including fighting for the continued freedom of users to communicate securely, without backdoors
  • Privacy - continuing leadership on raising public awareness of privacy to build a better, more open Internet future, and evangelizing and advocating for better data privacy policies

Openness + innovation

Our work on openness and innovation includes, but goes beyond, net neutrality and intellectual property, centering around the values of competition, interoperability, and innovation. Active issues in this pillar include:

  • Net neutrality - protecting the Internet’s status quo of a level playing field to promote innovation, competition, and user choice
  • Copyright - taking part in U.S. and E.U. conversations with the objective of strengthening fair use and safe harbors for intermediary liability to promote technology innovation
  • Patent - supporting process reforms to discourage excessive and anti-innovation litigation, paired with targeted advocacy efforts around software patent scope
  • Internet governance - engaging with ever shifting global Internet governance forums and structures, seeking potential for impact despite glacial pace of change
  • Access - developing strategies to connect new Internet users to the global open Web, and engaging with telecommunications policy issues as applicable

Forums

The primary open forum for Mozilla public policy and Advocacy Community engagement is Discourse. Discourse includes open discussion of policy issues, along with project and job opportunities and other engagements.

We had an mailing list. Historically, this mailing list was the primary place for discussion of policy issues.

New Ideas

If you have an Internet policy issue that you think Mozilla should consider intervening in, please submit it for consideration via our Policy Support form or Bugzilla. Please consider the 'Purpose' section below, as well as the issue areas of interest above, in making your submission.

Purpose

What's Mozilla's role in public policy?

Mozilla believes the Web should be open and available to everyone, and this openness is essential to a healthy cyber economy. We focus on advancing key characteristics of the open Web, not specific functions like social media or videos, which will always be in flux.

The strength of the Web and its economy rests on a number of core building blocks that make up its foundational DNA. Think of them as requirements to support a full range of social, business, governmental, and educational interactions and communications that underlie the importance of the Web in our lives today.

When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.

Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA. We want to empower anyone to join us, and become a champion and steward of the healthy Web, to help ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2 billion people who join.

So what do we do?

We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web:

  • without compromising core code and product efforts,
  • only when Mozilla can add extra value,
  • directly or indirectly.

We aren't a typical lobby shop - not even close. We do have and maintain relationships, and we understand and think about politics. But we focus our engagement on issues, in contexts, and at times where we can dive deep, work strategically, and have outsize impact.

How do we do it?

We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:

  • educate and inform,
  • organize and convene,
  • enable and support,
  • advocate and engage, and
  • hack, code and implement.

We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.

Join us

To learn more about how you can help us take action, visit our Advocacy page.