Compatibility/System Addon/Release Process: Difference between revisions

Add notes on how to uplift something in the firefox-android repo
m (DenSchub moved page Compatibility/Interventions Releases to Compatibility/System Addon/Release Process: This is about the WebCompat System Addon, and thus should be in the right namespace. Makes it easier to find.)
(Add notes on how to uplift something in the firefox-android repo)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
__TOC__  
__TOC__  


== Currently Released Interventions ==
Generally speaking, new interventions are landed in <tt>mozilla-central</tt> close to the start of each cycle's soft freeze period, and then ride the trains to Release. By essentially skipping the Nightly cycle, we speed up the process a bit, but we get some stability testing in Beta before the interventions are available to all users.


A usually up-to-date list of interventions currently shipped can be found with a search for [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=label%3Asitepatch-applied web-bugs issues labeled with "sitepatch-applied"], and on Bugzilla with a search for [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?v1=%5Bwebcompat%3Asitepatch-applied%5D&f1=status_whiteboard&o1=substring&query_format=advanced issues with the "[webcompat:sitepatch-applied<nowiki>]</nowiki>" whiteboard tag].
In cases that are more urgent, we can speed up the process by


= Interventions Release Process =
* uplifting interventions into Beta at any time during the cycle,
* uplifting the interventions into Release to be shipped with the next dot-release,
* shipping an interventions add-on update out-of-band.


''Note: for simplicity, interventions and UA overrides will be referred to solely as interventions in this section.''
It is up to each release's Interventions Owner to decide if a WebCompat bug is important enough to warrant a fast process.


== Intervention Types ==
== The normal process: Letting interventions ride the train ==
There are two types of interventions that we ship in Firefox: high priority and low priority. As a general rule of thumb, a low priority intervention will fix a long-standing bug. A high priority intervention will fix a regression in a top site. In case of confusion, please get in touch with Dennis Schubert for clarification as to which class we’re dealing with.


Low priority interventions should be landed in the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon Mozilla webcompat-addon repo] on GitHub and upstreamed to the relevant tree once per release. These do not require outside collaboration or approval to ship, beyond WebCompat Addon module peer or owner approval.
For low-priority interventions, the simplest way to ship is to land them in the tree and have them ride the trains like any code change.


High priority interventions require shipping out-of-band via Balrog ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1571535 or Normandy in the future]), and as such, require a more in-depth QA and Relman release process.
# Build and test the interventions as usual. Submit a Pull Request to the <tt>mozilla-extensions/webcompat</tt> GitHub repository that does include new interventions, but do not include a version number bump yet.
# Bump the version number in <tt>manifest.json</tt> in your local clone of the repo, but do not commit the change yet.
# Export your changed sources into your <tt>mozilla-central</tt> checkout. Check the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon#readme addon's <tt>README.md</tt>] for instructions on how to use the tooling.
# Make sure <tt>./mach lint browser/extensions/webcompat</tt> passes. Since the on-GitHub lints are not exactly the same (primarily, <tt>eslint</tt> is missing), it's a good idea to run that every time.
# Submit the patch to Phabricator. You do not ''need'' to manually specify a reviewer: the <tt>webcompat-reviewers</tt> group will be added automatically, sending a notification to everyone in the team.
# Land the patch. Wait until the patch got merged into <tt>mozilla-central</tt> to make sure it doesn't get backed out immediately.
# Export the same sources into your local checkout of <tt>android-components</tt>. There is tooling to help you with that as well, see [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon#readme addon's <tt>README.md</tt>]. [https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/android-components/pull/11938 Example Pull Request]. To make it easier to keep track of, attach a link to the pull request to the corresponding bug on Bugzilla. If you don't know someone who can review your patch, ask in <tt>#fenix-team</tt> on Slack.
# When the patch is merged, you can commit the version number change in the <tt>webcompat-addon</tt> repository. Make sure to run <tt>npm run autoformat</tt> before commiting, as that will apply your version number change to <tt>package.json</tt> and <tt>package-lock.json</tt> as well.
# Tag the version with <tt>git tag -a v100.0.0 -m 'v100.0.0'</tt>, and push both your version-bump-commit, and the new tag, to GitHub with <tt>git push origin main v100.0.0</tt>
# Make sure that for any intervention you added, you set the <tt>sitepatch-applied</tt> label GitHub or the <tt><nowiki>
[webcompat:sitepatch-applied]</nowiki></tt> whiteboard flag on Bugzilla. Likewise, remove those labels for all interventions you removed.


== Shipping Scenarios ==
== Uplifting new interventions into Beta ==
All interventions should first land in the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon Mozilla webcompat-addon repo] on GitHub and be accompanied by a version number bump in the addon’s manifest.json. There may be high priority situations where it’s more desirable to land in Mozilla Central first. In these cases, the patches must be backported to GitHub as soon as the intervention is shipped.


Once the intervention is reviewed by a [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All#WebCompat_Addons WebCompat Addon module peer] and landed, one or more of the following shipping scenarios is followed, depending on the affected platforms and products:
=== mozilla-central ===


=== Desktop Releases ===
For interventions that are a bit more urgent, you can skip one release cycle and uplift your intervention(s) into Beta. However, '''do not just request beta uplift''' for the patch you submitted to <tt>mozilla-central</tt>:


==== Low Priority ====
* It is possible that your patch was not the only change to the addon since the Beta branch got merged. This would cause conflicts, because your new patch won't cleanly apply to Beta.
# Make sure the version number in manifest.json is incremented.
* Version numbers won't make sense: If you're uplifting a patch for the addon version <tt>101.0.0</tt> into Beta 100, you might make version numbers more confusing, and you also will make rolling out of-of-band updates a bit more complicated.
# Land the updated addon version in Mozilla Central via a bug in [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Web%20Compatibility&component=Interventions&resolution=---&list_id=15330878 Web Compatibility::Interventions]
* It generally is a good idea to limit your Beta uplift to only the important/urgent things. It might not be a wise idea to uplift everything, which might include logic changes, SmartBlock Fixes, and other changes into beta. Keep the risk as low as possible.
## Export the sources into mozilla-central using the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon#exporting-the-sources-to-mozilla-central export-mc jake command].
## Create a patch for mozilla-central, upload it to Phabricator, and have a WebCompat Addon module peer review that.
# That’s it. Let the code ride the trains.


==== High Priority ====
Instead, we generally build a separate patch just for Beta.
{{todo| make sure this is up to date with the new mozilla-extensions github actions workflow when work is done|denschub}}


Changes to the Interventions Add-on can be directly deployed to release-users, which allows for interventions that do not require a dot-release. System Addon rollouts go into effect immediately after launching it, with the first Firefox users picking up the update within an hour. The majority of users will have received the update within five days.
# Follow the "normal process", and get your interventions landed in <tt>mozilla-central</tt>. Wait for the next Nightly build, and make sure your interventions work as you expect.
# In your local <tt>mozilla-central</tt> checkout, switch to the <tt>mozilla-beta</tt> branch/bookmark. If you've never done this before, check [https://mozilla-version-control-tools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/hgmozilla/unifiedrepo.html the documentation explaining how to work with the <tt>mozilla-unified</tt> repository].
# Apply the relevant changes to the Firefox sources.
#* If your patch is simple, you can apply the changes directly to your <tt>mozilla-beta</tt> tree.
#* If your changes are more complicated, it might be a good idea to use the export tooling in our GitHub repo. You can <tt>git checkout</tt> the tag corresponding to the version currently shipping in Beta, and then <tt>git cherry-pick</tt> individual patches from <tt>main</tt> into your temporary branch. There is no need to publish/merge that branch upstream, as your beta rollout should never include any interventions that aren't also in the <tt>main</tt> branch anyway.
# Publish the beta patch to Phabricator and have a webcompat-reviewer rubberstamp the patch. It is a good idea to add a clear indication into the commit message saying that this patch is meant for the Beta branch. <tt>Bug 1234567 - Beta - Uplift v101 Interventions into v100 Beta.</tt> is an example.
# Set the <tt>approval-mozilla-beta?</tt> request flag, and explain in the comment why you think this patch should be uplifted to Beta.


A current overview of the high-level steps required to ship via ShipIt can be found [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AsyiOPDMVjWhDUD0fcdNw-kgLn8iLX_5DSVOvQk8TtQ/ this Google Doc (Mozilla-internal)]. Ping :denschub if something needs to be rolled out urgently.
A release manager will see your request. If your request is approved, the release managers will push your patch. You do not need to land it, or do anything else!


==== Fenix / Android Components ====
=== firefox-android ===
The system addon is served as a component. Currently [https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/blob/f5f0cb8d9caf556db586b248856a17e7052a4fa3/buildSrc/src/main/java/Dependencies.kt#L138 Fenix pulls in the latest version], which means the updated addon should be served in the next Google Play Store update.


# Export the sources into the android-components repo using the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon#exporting-the-sources-into-android-components export-ac export command].
For Android, the process is slightly different. After your Pull Request has been merged (and, ideally, tested), leave a comment in the Pull Request to tell the Mergify bot to create a backport PR (replace the version number with the target version number):
# File an issue and open a pull request against the [https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/android-components Android Components repo] on GitHub which contains the updated addon and request review. Any core member of the mozilla-mobile organization is happy to help, but :csadilek frequently reviews our changes, so he should be the first point of contact if possible.
# That’s it. The new version will be used when the new android-components version is released (currently weekly).


==== Firefox iOS ====
<tt>@mergify backport releases_v113</tt>


Firefox iOS has currently a [https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/firefox-ios/blob/41cc4065ea6f799bd0930e117c6ab3b2f8ee8447/Shared/UserAgent.swift very light UA override mechanism] (at the time of this writing).
The bot will create a new PR and attach that PR to the original Bugzilla bug. You don't have to work on the GitHub PR, but you have to set the <tt>approval-mozilla-beta?</tt> flag on Bugzilla for the backport PR. After that, Release Management will proceed as usual.


We [[Firefox iOS UA Override|need to define]] in cooperation with the Firefox iOS Team on how to remove the pain for users. Most of the issues are identified through webcompat reporting.
== Uplifting new interventions into Release ==


=== Final Checklist when shipping a release ===
If you want your interventions to be available to users very quickly, you can uplift them into <tt>mozilla-release</tt> and have it shipped in the next dot-release.


* [ ] Verify addon version has been incremented
# There is no fixed schedule for dot-releases, but you can reach out to the [[Release_Management/Release_owners|Release Owner]] and ask if a dot release is planned, and when it will be shipping. If there is a dot release coming up that fits your needs, let them know that you intend to ship WebCompat interventions in that release.
* [ ] Verify new intervention(s) appears in about:compat as expected
# Get your interventions into <tt>mozilla-central</tt> first, using the "normal process" explained above. Make sure it works!
* [ ] Close all Bugzilla bugs with interventions associated with the current release
# Then, you can follow the "uplifting into Beta" steps. The steps for Beta and Release are exactly the same, except that you're using a different branch/bookmark: <tt>mozilla-release</tt> instead of <tt>mozilla-beta</tt>.
* [ ] WebCompat QA has signed off on XPI
# You can request uplift for Beta and Release at the same time, but since these are two different patches, you have to request both uplifts separately in two comments.
* [ ] Balrog folks have uploaded XPI
* [ ] Relman has signed off on XPI in Balrog
* [ ] Desktop ESR uplift request, when relevant
* [ ] m-c beta or ESR uplift request, when relevant
* [ ] Intent to Ship email is sent to release-drivers@ mailing list for high priority releases
* [ ] WebCompat QA marks each Bugzilla bug associated with the release as VERIFIED


=== Checklist for follow-ups after landing/deploying everywhere ===
== Shipping interventions with an out-of-band System Addon Update ==
When the new addon version is released everywhere and there will be no more changes to that version, there are a couple of follow-up steps to do in preparation for the next release cycle.


* [ ] Tag the version on GitHub with `git tag -a v8.0.0 -m 'v8.0.0'` and push the tags with `git push --tags` so we have a persistent record of "what shipped when" on GitHub as well.
=== Prerequisites ===


= Interventions Release Rotations =  
Before you can do any of the work outlined here, you need to make sure that your Mozilla LDAP account is a member of the <tt>vpn_cloudops_shipit</tt> and <tt>xpi_system_build</tt> groups. If you are not sure, [https://firefox-ci-tc.services.mozilla.com/profile check your LDAP profile here (Mozilla-internal)]. If one or both groups are missing, file a bug similar to [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1683143 bug 1683143 (Mozilla-internal)].
Engineers on the Web Compatibility team will rotate on ownership of shipping new versions of our interventions addons, serving as an Intervention Release Owner (IRO). The process will follow a predictable 4 week schedule, mirroring the proposed 4 week [[Release_Management/Calendar|Firefox release schedule]], however, we will attempt to land the interventions 1 week before soft freeze (see the schedule above for dates). Another way to look at this is 2 weeks before release.  
 
You also need to be able to connect to the Mozilla Corporate VPN to use ShipIt. See [https://mana.mozilla.org/wiki/display/SD/VPN this guide (Mozilla-internal)] if you're currently not set up for that.
 
=== Preparations ===
 
Since all changes that are about to be shipped need QA verification, we try to limit the changes to only the things we absolutely need to ship to Release users. As opposed to the other workflows, the primary work for rolling out an update happens on GitHub. Syncing the code back into <tt>mozilla-central</tt> is a step to be done after the update has been kicked off.
 
The addon's GitHub repository has a <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch. This branch does not automatically track what's shipping in Firefox Release, and we do not have a process for updating the branch each release cycle. Instead, before doing any work, you have to update the hotfix branch to match the code shipping to Firefox Release. To update that branch:
 
# Switch your local checkout of the addon sources to the <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch. Make sure to <tt>git pull</tt>, in case your local checkout is outdated.
# In your <tt>mozilla-central</tt> clone, check out the <tt>mozilla-release</tt> branch/bookmark.
# Check which commit touched the landed addon sources last. If you're using Git for your <tt>mozilla-central</tt>, you can use <tt>git log browser/extensions/webcompat/</tt>. With <tt>git show [the last commit's hash]</tt> check which version number the sources were bumped to.
#* If the version number has a [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon/tags corresponding tag in the addon's repository], you can merge that tag into the <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch with <tt>git merge --ff-only v100.2.1</tt>.
#* If the version number does not have a tag, check [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon/commits/main the addon's commit history], and find the commit hash of the backporting commit of that change. Merge the sources up until that commit into the <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch with <tt>git merge --ff-only [commit hash]</tt>.
#* If the change has not been backported, or you cannot merge a tag/commit cleanly without conflicts, press the "emergency meeting" button in the team. Something has gone really wrong.


A tracking bug for the next release should be filed in Bugzilla (in the [[ & Tooling|Web Compatibility::Interventions]] component). Bugs for adding or removing interventions in the current release cycle should block this bug.
If you're done, running the "export into mozilla-central" command should result in no actual changes to your <tt>mozilla-release</tt> checkout. If there are any changes, you merged the wrong tag or commit. Make sure the export is "clean" before proceeding. Otherwise, you might end up accidentally shipping the wrong/additional changes to release.


During bug diagnosis, if a site is identified as a low priority intervention candidate, a [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/labels/action-needssitepatch label is added] for the next IRO to take care of during their rotation. Low priority interventions ride the trains without any need for uplifts or out of band shipping mechanisms. The expectation is that there will be a single regular low-priority release for each version of Firefox, driven by the IRO.  
If the export is not resulting in any changes, <tt>git push</tt> the updated <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch to GitHub.


High priority interventions should be flagged immediately to the IRO who will then begin the process necessary to ship an off-train intervention.
Make sure the [[Release Management/Release owners|the Release Manager owning the target Firefox version]] is aware of your intentions to ship an update. Also, have a chat with our Softvision WebCompat team member so they can schedule a bit of time testing your release.


== Interventions Release Rotations ==
=== Preparing your patch ===


Engineers on the Web Compatibility team will rotate on ownership of shipping new versions of our interventions addons, serving as an Intervention Release Owner (IRO). The process will follow a predictable 4 week schedule, mirroring the proposed 4 week Firefox release schedule.
# With the addon's <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch as a base, switch to a new branch for your changes.
# Write and test your interventions as usual. Commit them as usual as well.
# In a separate commit in your branch, bump the version number by a patch-level increase, for example from <tt>100.1.0</tt> to <tt>100.1.1</tt>. Commit that change as well. Make sure that the commit bumping the version number is last in your branch, if it isn't, use <tt>git rebase -i release-hotfix</tt> to reorder the commits.
# Open a PR for your changes. GitHub should figure out that the base branch is <tt>release-hotfix</tt>, but if it doesn't, make sure to set that correctly before submitting the PR.
# Have another member of the team review your PR.
# Test your changes once again, for good measure. Then, merge your PR into the <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch.


During bug diagnosis, if a site is identified as a low priority intervention candidate, a label shall be added for the IRO to take care of during their rotation. Low priority interventions ride the trains without any need for uplifts or out of band shipping mechanisms. The expectation is that there will be a single regular low-priority release for each version of Firefox, driven by the IRO.
=== Kicking off the build process ===


High priority interventions should be flagged immediately to the IRO who will then begin the process necessary to ship an off-train intervention.
For testing, we do not use the build artifacts for each commit on GitHub, and instead start a new release on ShipIt. The reason we do not use the dep-signed XPI from a commit's job is consistency: When you start a release on ShipIt, it builds an <tt>.xpi</tt> for you to test. In the end, once all testing and QA'ing is done, the same <tt>.xpi</tt> will be shipped to our users, just with a different signature. Essentially, this means we are QA'ing "the same binary" that will be shipped, reducing the chance of weird build-specific glitches.


== Candidates for interventions ==
# Follow the [https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/xpi-manifest/blob/main/docs/releasing-a-xpi.md#starting-the-build-phase "Starting the build phase" steps here].
There is a [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+label%3Aaction-needssitepatch list of sites] as well as a [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Web%20Compatibility&component=Interventions&resolution=---&list_id=15328531 Bugzilla bug query] for sites that need interventions. In addition, the [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Atype-uaoverride+ `type-uaoverride`] label may be useful to look at. During a rotation, you should look at both of these sites and determine which are the most important to work on and ship (or close, if appropriate).
#* The list of available XPIs has two WebCompat entires: <tt>webcompat</tt> and <tt>webcompat-release-hotfix</tt>. Pick <tt>webcompat-release-hotfix</tt>, as the other one will build and release the <tt>main</tt> branch.
#* When selecting the revision, double-check that the last revision is correct. This should be a merge commit merging your PR.
# The "Build" link in ShipIt links to taskcluster. You'll see a <tt>dep-signing-webcompat-release-hotfix</tt> task. When the task is completed, the artifacts for that task includes a <tt>webcompat.xpi</tt>. Copy the URL to that.
# Ask our QA friends to test that dep-signed XPI.
#* A template for a QA request can be found [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767811#c5 here].
#* The link to the XPI is the one you copied earlier.
#* Links to current unbranded builds can be found [[Add-ons/Extension_Signing#Unbranded_Builds|here]].
# After QA is done testing the dep-signed XPI, you need two System Addon admins (or one SAO admin and a Release Engineer as backup) to sign off. Use the <tt>#addons-pipeline</tt> channel on Slack to ask. To make everyone's work easy, provide a link to the bug and a link to the changes (for example a link to the merged GitHub PR).
# When you have received the necessary signoffs, the Ship graph will be triggered, which will sign the .xpi with a Release certificate. Ask a Release Engineer (if in doubt, use the same Slack channel) to get the release-signed .xpi into Balrog's <tt>release-sysaddon</tt> channel. They'll need to know which Firefox version(s) you're targeting with your update, which usually is all minor versions of a given release, i.e. <tt>100.*</tt>.
# When a release engineer created and deployed the <tt>release-sysaddon</tt> rules, ask our QA people to run a second round of testing.
#* A template with all relevant explanations can be found [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767811#c9 here].
#* Note that this should be tested with the real Firefox Release version, not an unbranded build. This testing round is your final chance to catch any errors.
# When your second QA run passed, ask Release Management for formal approval. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767811#c15 This bug comment] is an example. Provide as much detail as you can to make sure Release Management knows everything they need to know.
# After Release Management has signed off, ask a Release Engineer to deploy the rule to the <tt>release</tt> channel.


Lists of currently deployed interventions across the products and channels are available here https://arewehotfixingthewebyet.com/.  
The update is now live.  


In addition, there is also a [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3Asitepatch-applied `sitepatch-applied`] label that helps to keep track of existing interventions. Take care to add this to bugs after shipping a site patch.
=== Follow-up work ===


== IRO Rotation Responsibilities ==
* In the addon's GitHub repo, tag the commit you're rolling out. Push the tag, and merge the <tt>release-hotfix</tt> branch into <tt>main</tt>. This merge will most likely conflict, as the version numbers will disagree. Resolve that conflict by using the current version number from <tt>main</tt> and bump that number by one minor release.
* Authoring, testing, landing high priority intervention patches
* Even though your code is now shipping to release, please make sure to land your changes to <tt>mozilla-central</tt>, <tt>mozilla-beta</tt>, and <tt>mozilla-release</tt>. Nightly and Beta users will not receive your update, and even for Release users, it's important to ship the new addon version in a dot release, since new profiles otherwise won't get the new interventions immediately and have to wait for the background update. See the uplifting docs above, everything still applies.
* Authoring, testing, landing normal priority interventions
* Make sure to label/close all relevant Bugzilla bugs, apply the <tt>sitepatch-applied</tt> label on GitHub, and all the other cleanup work you do in a regular release.
* Requesting testing of high risk interventions from the WebCompat QA team
* Optional: You might be interested in keeping an eye on Telemetry data for the rollout. You can create a copy of [https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/queries/85734#212283 this telemetry dashboard (Mozilla-internal)], making sure to change the start date, the Firefox version, and the addon version as needed. If you are running into issues, ask :denschub, or ask in <tt>#data-help</tt> on Slack.
* Coordinating QA verification and release stakeholders (Balrog, AC, etc) for high priority interventions
* Sending an intent-to-ship email for high priority intervention patches
* Landing patches in GitHub, Mozilla Central, and Android Components repos
* Requesting uplifts for interventions when necessary
* Backporting interventions from mozilla-central where necessary (see [https://github.com/mozilla/webcompat-addon/wiki/Backporting-a-mozilla-central-patch Backporting a Mozilla Central Patch]).
* Handling potential regression fallout from interventions
* Add sitepatch-applied labels to web-bugs issues, as relevant.


== Intervention Release Owner Schedule ==
= Interventions Release Rotations =  


For simplicity, we rotate on a per-release following the Nightly schedule at [[Release_Management/Calendar|Firefox Release Calendar]].
Engineers on the Web Compatibility team will rotate on ownership of shipping new versions of our interventions addons, serving as an Intervention Release Owner (IRO). The process will follow a predictable 4 week schedule, mirroring the [[Release_Management/Calendar|Firefox release schedule]]. However, we will attempt to land the interventions 1 week before soft freeze (see the schedule above for dates). Another way to look at this is 2 weeks before release.  


=== Upcoming Releases ===
A tracking bug for the next release should be filed in Bugzilla (in the [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Web%20Compatibility&component=Interventions <tt>Web Compatibility::Interventions</tt> component]). Bugs for adding or removing interventions in the current release cycle should block this bug.


* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752989 Version 102] - Ksenia 2022-05-26 2022H1
During bug diagnosis, if a site is identified as a low priority intervention candidate, a <tt>action-needssitepatch</tt> label is added for the next IRO to take care of during their rotation. High priority interventions should be flagged immediately to the IRO who will then begin the process necessary to ship an off-train intervention.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752990 Version 103] - Tom 2022-06-23 2022H1


=== Past Releases ===
== Candidates for interventions ==


* Firefox 74 (v7) - Ksenia
There is a [https://github.com/webcompat/web-bugs/issues?q=label%3Aaction-needssitepatch dedicated <tt>action-needssitepatch</tt> label on GitHub] as well as a [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Web%20Compatibility&component=Interventions&resolution=--- Bugzilla bug query] for sites that need interventions. During a rotation, you should look at both of these sites and determine which are the most important to work on and ship (or close, if appropriate).
* Firefox 75 (v8) - Dennis
* Firefox 76 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621062 v9]) - Mike
* Firefox 77 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1625222 v10]) - Ksenia
* Firefox 78 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1631858 v11]) - Mike
* Firefox 79 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1637672 v12]) - Dennis
* Firefox 80 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1647771 v13]) - Karl
* Firefox 81 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1649243 v14]) - Ksenia
* Firefox 82 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1649244 v15]) - Tom
* Firefox 83 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1663967 v16]) - Dennis
* Firefox 84 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1663978 v17]) - Karl
* Firefox 85 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1663980 v18]) - Ksenia
* Firefox 86 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1686065 v19]) - Tom 2021-01-21 2021Q1
* Firefox 87 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1688792 v20]) - Dennis 2021-02-18 2021Q1
* Firefox 88 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1693824 v21]) - Karl 2021-03-18 2021Q1
* Firefox 89 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1702011 v22]) - Ksenia 2021-04-15 2021Q2
* Firefox 90 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1707797 v23]) - Tom 2021-05-27 2021Q2
* Firefox 91 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1714611 v24]) - Dennis 2021-07-08 2021Q2
* Firefox 92 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720138 v25]) - Karl 2021-08-05 2021H2
* Firefox 93 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720139 v26]) - Ksenia 2021-09-02 2021H2
* Firefox 94 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720140 v27]) - Tom 2021-09-30 2021H2
* Firefox 95 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720142 v28]) - Dennis 2021-10-28 2021H2
* Firefox 96 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1720143 v29]) - Karl 2021-12-02 2021H2
* Firefox 98 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1749436 v30]) - Ksenia 2022-02-03 2022H1
* Firefox 99 ([https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752986 v31]) - Tom 2022-03-03 2022H1
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752987 Version 100] - Dennis 2022-03-31 2022H1
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752988 Version 101] - Dennis 2022-04-28 2022H1


[[Category:Web Compatibility]]
[[Category:Web Compatibility]]
202

edits