canmove, Confirmed users
1,577
edits
Evangelism/WebsiteCompatibilityInternational: Difference between revisions
Evangelism/WebsiteCompatibilityInternational (view source)
Revision as of 20:47, 10 March 2009
, 10 March 2009→Feedback
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
** Gen's post on compatibility: http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/ | ** Gen's post on compatibility: http://blog.mozilla.com/gen/2007/11/08/browser-and-web-content-compatibility-in-asia/ | ||
* The goal says to "improve Firefox website compatibility and the use of open standards outside of the US and Europe" -- does that exclude Europe? There are still website compatibility problems in Sweden. (djst) | * The goal says to "improve Firefox website compatibility and the use of open standards outside of the US and Europe" -- does that exclude Europe? There are still website compatibility problems in Sweden. (djst) | ||
** No, no exclusion. But we have a larger problem outside of the US and Europe so that's where it will be most effective. | |||
* In the dashboard in Stage 2, per-country is mentioned. Does that mean "issue reported from a user in country X" or "issue reported on a website hosted in country X"? The latter seems more relevant if we want to form local teams of evangelism experts that can reach out to website owners. (djst) | * In the dashboard in Stage 2, per-country is mentioned. Does that mean "issue reported from a user in country X" or "issue reported on a website hosted in country X"? The latter seems more relevant if we want to form local teams of evangelism experts that can reach out to website owners. (djst) | ||
** We only have data from the users and I imagine there's a rough correlation from users to where web sites are hosted. I suspect the data will still be very actionable. (blizzard) | |||
* Having per-country lists of problematic websites (cross-run with the list of the most popular websites of that locale) would be a very effective way of proactively getting support articles written, possible by the same team of people that test these websites. (djst) | * Having per-country lists of problematic websites (cross-run with the list of the most popular websites of that locale) would be a very effective way of proactively getting support articles written, possible by the same team of people that test these websites. (djst) | ||
** Yep - that's in the list here. We'll need data from somewhere else to cross-match, but if we have country data it will be pretty useful to make things actionable. | |||