Firefox/Projects/About:newtab: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
** [http://hg.mozilla.org/users/dmills_mozilla.com/about-tab Sources on mercurial]
** [http://hg.mozilla.org/users/dmills_mozilla.com/about-tab Sources on mercurial]
** [[About:newtab/VersionHistory|Version History]]
** [[About:newtab/VersionHistory|Version History]]
= History =
We've been iterating frequently to find a good balance for the new tab page. Below are an outline of a couple of the major decisions and why we made them.
* '''No Thumbnails'''. This is the largest departure from the original mockups and other browsers. After trying a number of different layouts we reached a couple realizations:
** Thumbnails are a high-noise, low-information-density medium. Few people have a strong association between a site and it's zoomed-out view. The association to name and fav-icon is much stronger.
** In small-scale tests, the upper-left corner of a site was much easier to identify a site by than the full site. That's because the upper-left is where the site's logo normally resides.
** Safari's implementation shows a number of the pitfalls.


= References =
= References =

Revision as of 23:48, 25 March 2009

Overview

Drivers: Dan Mills (thunder), Aza Razkin (aza), Edward Lee (Mardak)
Get involved: by hopping onto #labs on irc.mozilla.org or clicking on Discussion and leaving your comments

Description
Instead of a blank page, the new tab page should present useful task-centric navigation options based on the user's history.


Goals / Use Cases

  • be perceptibly as fast as about:blank to load
  • allow user to re-open previously closed tabs
  • offer navigation targets that are likely to be of use to the user
  • do not break the user's mental "flow" or otherwise interrupt a user task


Non Goals

  • act as a content aggregator for "new" material


Download

History

We've been iterating frequently to find a good balance for the new tab page. Below are an outline of a couple of the major decisions and why we made them.

  • No Thumbnails. This is the largest departure from the original mockups and other browsers. After trying a number of different layouts we reached a couple realizations:
    • Thumbnails are a high-noise, low-information-density medium. Few people have a strong association between a site and it's zoomed-out view. The association to name and fav-icon is much stronger.
    • In small-scale tests, the upper-left corner of a site was much easier to identify a site by than the full site. That's because the upper-left is where the site's logo normally resides.
    • Safari's implementation shows a number of the pitfalls.

References