Talk:Security/CSP/Spec: Difference between revisions

m
Line 127: Line 127:
This sounds to me like over-complication. What's the use case? -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]]
This sounds to me like over-complication. What's the use case? -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]]


== "font-src" directive (<span style="color:red;">CLOSED</span>)==
== "font-src" and "xhr-src" directives (<span style="color:red;">CLOSED</span>)==


Should there be a "font-src" restriction? -EricLaw
Should there be a "font-src" restriction? -EricLaw
Line 133: Line 133:
Good question.  Right now fonts are subject to the "allow" catch-all directive, and loading third-party fonts requires loosening that restriction.  Perhaps we should discuss adding such a directive as well as an xhr-source directive (for when cross-site xhr explodes). -[[User:Sidstamm|Sid]]
Good question.  Right now fonts are subject to the "allow" catch-all directive, and loading third-party fonts requires loosening that restriction.  Perhaps we should discuss adding such a directive as well as an xhr-source directive (for when cross-site xhr explodes). -[[User:Sidstamm|Sid]]


I think we should do this, since fonts are a whole new beast.  Marking this as closed; reopen if there's an objection.
I think we should do this, since fonts are a whole new beast.  Marking this as closed; reopen if there's an objection. I'm also adding an XHR-src.
 
-[[User:Sidstamm|Sid]]
-[[User:Sidstamm|Sid]]


canmove, Confirmed users
1,537

edits