Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,976
edits
Talk:RDF:Interfaces: Difference between revisions
battle star visit
No edit summary |
(battle star visit) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
I'll take a mental note. | I'll take a mental note. | ||
== visit return type == | |||
Enn: rdfITripleVisitor.visit should just return true or false to continue iterating rather than using an incomprehsible system of error codes. In fact, I don't even know how I would get such a return code from JS. | Enn: rdfITripleVisitor.visit should just return true or false to continue iterating rather than using an incomprehsible system of error codes. In fact, I don't even know how I would get such a return code from JS. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
Enn: huh? The goal is to make the lesser used C++ less cumbersome yet make the more common JS usage more cumbersome? That makes no sense. | Enn: huh? The goal is to make the lesser used C++ less cumbersome yet make the more common JS usage more cumbersome? That makes no sense. | ||
Well, most of the time, the visit code will not bother about iteration, isn't a "you have to return true to make it work" more cumbersome? I don't like the idea of having two ways of stopping iterations, either, as you could still throw an exception or return false. I'm really not digging that. --[[User:AxelHecht|AxelHecht]] 08:00, 16 Jun 2005 (PDT) | |||