Labs/Jetpack/Release Notes/0.2: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Version 0.2 features a number of bug fixes and minor enhancements, especially for Windows users. In particular, it’s now easier to run unit tests and see their results on Windows. It does not yet include the high-level APIs we’re developing for simplified add-on development, however. Those will begin arriving in future releases.
Version 0.2 features a number of bug fixes and minor enhancements, especially for Windows users. In particular, it’s now easier to run unit tests and see their results on Windows. It does not yet include the high-level APIs we’re developing for simplified add-on development, however. Those will begin arriving in future releases.


These are some of the notable bugs we fixed in 0.2:
Notable bug fixes:


* {{bug|551307|Python error when running cfx test on Windows}}  
* {{bug|551307|Python error when running cfx test on Windows}}  
* {{bug|551335|<tt>--no-quit</tt> option doesn't work w/ cfx on Windows}}
* {{bug|550368|Syntax errors in modules don't raise tracebacks or line numbers}}
* {{bug|550368|Syntax errors in modules don't raise tracebacks or line numbers}}
Notable enhancements:
* The --no-quit flag is no longer necessary to see test results on Windows, and it has been removed.


A complete list of changes is available in the [http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/jetpack-sdk/ source code repository].
A complete list of changes is available in the [http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/jetpack-sdk/ source code repository].
Line 24: Line 27:
== Known Issues ==
== Known Issues ==


* The --no-quit flag is no longer necessary to see test results on Windows, and it has been removed.
* The <tt>cfx test</tt> and <tt>run</tt> commands generate the message "Program terminated unsuccessfully" on some OSes, even though the commands succeed.
* The <tt>cfx test</tt> and <tt>run</tt> commands generate the message "Program terminated unsuccessfully" on some OSes, even though the commands succeed.


canmove, Confirmed users
2,056

edits