HTML/img: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎alt guidance needs simplification: add more specific URLs)
Line 12: Line 12:


=== alt guidance needs simplification ===
=== alt guidance needs simplification ===
Regarding http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers
Regarding 4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers
* http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers
* http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers


The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in HTML5 is bad for authors, and for author understanding.
The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in HTML5 is bad for authors, and for author understanding.
Line 19: Line 21:
* "... document is an e-mail ..." - not a useful case
* "... document is an e-mail ..." - not a useful case
* meta generator - causes as many problems as it solves
* meta generator - causes as many problems as it solves
As well as the authoring guidance in the section(s) below:
* Remove: 4.8.1.1.11 An image in an e-mail or private document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images.
** http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/embedded-content-1.html#an-image-in-an-e-mail-or-private-document-intended-for-a-specific-person-who-is-known-to-be-able-to-view-images


See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80
See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80

Revision as of 07:38, 1 August 2010

Welcome to the Mozilla wiki page on the HTML5 <img> element. Please feel free to contribute new test pages or new sections. -- Tantek

This article is a stub. You can help MozillaWiki by expanding it.

img element test pages

  • ...

img element demo pages

  • ...

img element spec issues

alt guidance needs simplification

Regarding 4.8.1.1.14 Guidance for conformance checkers

The complexity of the authoring guidance for the new alt attribute in HTML5 is bad for authors, and for author understanding.

We should remove the last two points in this section:

  • "... document is an e-mail ..." - not a useful case
  • meta generator - causes as many problems as it solves

As well as the authoring guidance in the section(s) below:

See related http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80

reject longdesc

see also