GovernanceIssues: Difference between revisions

GovernanceIssues (view source)

Revision as of 11:44, 4 January 2011

No change in size , 4 January 2011

no edit summary

Gerv

Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

4,925

edits

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 Status: shaver wants a wider discussion than we have had so far; Gerv to find out what that means in practice.
+===Shouldn't-Be-Private Mailing Lists===
+Issue: Mozilla runs a large number of mailing lists, as well as our public [http://www.mozilla.org/community/developer-forums.html discussion forums]. We should audit that list to make sure no project discussion is private when it should be (at least) read-only public.
+Actions: Gerv wrote a small script to extract a list of possibly-concerning mailing lists from mailman. He has had several iterations of the list from mzeier, refining the script each time.
+Status: an initial look suggested that this was not a big problem. Although the analysis was not exhaustive, it was sufficient.
 ==Resolved==
@@ Line 63: / Line 71: @@
 Status: program retired.
-===Shouldn't-Be-Private Mailing Lists===
-Issue: Mozilla runs a large number of mailing lists, as well as our public [http://www.mozilla.org/community/developer-forums.html discussion forums]. We should audit that list to make sure no project discussion is private when it should be (at least) read-only public.
-Actions: Gerv wrote a small script to extract a list of possibly-concerning mailing lists from mailman. He has had several iterations of the list from mzeier, refining the script each time.
-Status: an initial look suggested that this was not a big problem. Although the analysis was not exhaustive, it was sufficient.
 ===Trim Super-Reviewers List===