Fennec/NativeUI/Showcase1-25: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
*
*


*Compared to XUL: Where are we Better, Where are we worse?
== Compared to XUL: Where are we Better, Where are we worse? ==
*Better: Use less memory, async panning, sync runs in the background,  
*Better: Use less memory, async panning, sync runs in the background,  
*Worse: Checkerboarding,
*Worse: Checkerboarding,

Revision as of 17:59, 25 January 2012

  • To refresh on the list of Features and their priority, click here.
  • To refresh on the plan of record per Toronto's offsite, click here.
  • To see baseline vs. current reality, click here: here

ADU update

  • Aurora - % from last week
  • Nightly - % from last week
  • Beta - %
  • Aurota - %

Schedule

Q4

  • Dec 2011: Feature Complete

Q1

  • Jan 16 2012: String Freeze -> needs to be reset
  • Jan 16 2012: First Run Walk-Through --> needs to be reset
  • Jan 30 2012: Beta Declare
  • Feb 27 2012: Public Announcement at Mobile World Congress
  • March 30 2012: Final Release

Beta Readiness

Features

  • Split-APK
    • Status: Waiting for the fix for 719560
    • Requires: QA testing on tablets/phones once posted
    • Fallback options: Push XUL to all for the time being, only push to tablets, hold off on pushing altogether
  • Profile migration
    • Status: Waiting on the fix for 713283
    • Requires: QA test plan and verification (kbrosnan: test cases are complete & ready to go)
  • L10N
    • Required for String Freeze for Fx11 (Jan 30th):

(P0) Stability and Performance

Crashes

    • % of crashes that occur within .5s of startup and compare to XUL over nightly/aurora (smooney can help)
    • Devices that are crashing on launch (0?)
    • How many crashes in the top X has not exhausted QA/engineering possibilities for reproduction
    • Explanation of aurora/nightly population, affect on our testing

https://metrics.mozilla.com/pentaho/content/pentaho-cdf/RenderHTML?solution=metrics&path=blocklist_fennec/blocklist_fennec0&dashboard=template.html&template=new-metrics&title=Fennec%20Usage

    • Explanation of apples vs oranges
    • Web content crashes didn't appear in XUL
    • We're doing more in Java, so there will be more Java crashes

Performance and Responsiveness

Goals Related to Competitive Browsers

  • To be within 200MS of the Stock Browser for Raw Start

[See Video]

Compared to XUL: Where are we Better, Where are we worse?

  • Better: Use less memory, async panning, sync runs in the background,
  • Worse: Checkerboarding,

Website Compatibility

(Two-pronged approach)

MTD Update

MTD feedback in order of frequency:

  • "Feeling zippier"
  • Sync <--- people still want sync
  • Remaining checkerboarding
  • Localizations
  • Unzooming during page load
  • Frame rate when scrolling
  • Top sites still don't work
  • Flash on ICS