Platform/Features/Camera API: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Platform/Features/Camera API (view source)

Revision as of 18:49, 2 May 2012

1,311 bytes added , 2 May 2012

m

no edit summary

Asa

Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

2,974

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{FeatureStatus
-|Feature name=Ability to take a picture from a web page (<input type="picture">)
+|Feature name=Ability to take a picture from a web page (<input type="picture">) - "Phase 1"
-|Feature stage=Draft
+|Feature stage=Design
+|Feature status=In progress
+|Feature version=Firefox 15  (Maire to confirm)
 |Feature health=OK
-|Feature status note=This has progress on Mobile where an external app is being used to take a picture, but has no traction on desktop.
+|Feature status note=This is almost completed on Mobile where driver support is available via an external app; support for desktop will be added after the base WebRTC code is landed.
 }}
 {{FeatureTeam
-|Feature product manager=Chris Blizzard
+|Feature product manager=Maire Reavy
-|Feature feature manager=Chris Blizzard
+|Feature feature manager=Maire Reavy (was Chris Blizzard)
 |Feature lead engineer=Fabrice Desré
 |Feature security lead=Ian Melven
-|Feature qa lead=Aaron Train
+|Feature qa lead=John Hammink
+|Feature ux lead=Jennifer Morrow
+|Feature additional members=Erin Lancaster (project manager for Android)
 }}
 {{FeaturePageBody
@@ Line 17: / Line 21: @@
 * Take a profile photo on facebook, or upload from your gallery.
 * Instagram for the web.
-|Feature dependencies=* Definition of the experience that we want for developers and users.
+|Feature dependencies=* Requires an underlying implementation for capturing from camera devices. (done - anant has volunteered!)
-* Requires a solid camera camera API definition for web content.
-* Requires an underlying implementation for capturing from camera devices. (done - anant has volunteered!)
-* Requires someone to put it all together.
 |Feature requirements=For mobile we should use an external app for performance reasons.
-For desktop we should be able to display the image in a canvas for preview and the ability to modify it before uploading it to a server.
+For desktop we should be able to take an image snapshot.
-|Feature non-goals=This does not include the ability to capture a video and send that video somewhere.  This is only for taking a picture.
+|Feature non-goals=* This does not include the ability to capture a video and send that video somewhere.  This is only for taking a picture.
-|Feature implementation plan=Android support landed:
+*Previewing the image in a canvas with the ability to modify it before uploading it to a server;  previewing and modifying the image won't be possible with this implementation ([https://wiki.mozilla.org/Camera_API_-_Phase_2_%28getUserMedia%29 Phase 2 ] will eventually provide that functionality).
-https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659188
+|Feature ux design=[http://people.mozilla.com/~jboriss/specs/first_spec.png First iteration design specification]
-https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621915
+|Feature implementation plan=Mobile implementation is almost landed.
-Desktop bug, with an implementation for gstreamer (rotted, last touched on 2010-10-18):
+Main bug for desktop: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692955 Bug 692955]
-https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451674
+Currently waiting on three things to happen for desktop:
-We will use the GIPS code for this feature on desktop.
+* Implementation of the Chrome UI (fabrice)
+* Implementation of the in-page UI (mounir or dholbert)
+* WebRTC integration and landing (jesup):
+** Landing Windows build support (ted)
+** Pruning code base for image capture (as needed) (jesup)
+** Legal review (under way, no problems expected)
+** Security review of code paths needed for image capture (jesup, curtis)
+** Picking a 'stable point' in WebRTC upstream to use as the mergepoint (jesup)
+** Landing review of the capture code from webrtc (jesup)
+** Post-landing testing and debugging (jesup, fabrice, qa, etc)
+Ignore stuff below this line, here for history only.
+Android support landed:
+* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659188
+* https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621915
+|Feature landing criteria=Remaining bug for Android: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708175 Bug 708175], which was just marked resolved fixed (April 14).
 }}
 {{FeatureInfo
@@ Line 42: / Line 59: @@
 |Feature engineering team=DOM
 }}
-{{FeatureTeamStatus}}
+{{FeatureTeamStatus
+|Feature security status=sec-review-unnecessary
+|Feature security notes=Per note from imelven review unnecessary
+}}