Talk:Extension compatibility ideas: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Removing vandalism by Buljlwmg.) |
(UI-hooks as APIs?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== UI-hooks as APIs? == | |||
The proposal here assumes that extensions only depend on things with GUIDs, but there are other things, like for example IDs to hook up to in overlays as well as using known bugs in implementations of interfaces, fixing of which doesn't necessarily should rev the IID of the interface. | |||
We would need to rev all dependent contracts of a changed contract, too. | |||
Sounds hard to maintain. Harder than necessary? | |||
--[[User:AxelHecht|AxelHecht]] 08:38, 26 November 2006 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 26 November 2006
UI-hooks as APIs?
The proposal here assumes that extensions only depend on things with GUIDs, but there are other things, like for example IDs to hook up to in overlays as well as using known bugs in implementations of interfaces, fixing of which doesn't necessarily should rev the IID of the interface.
We would need to rev all dependent contracts of a changed contract, too.
Sounds hard to maintain. Harder than necessary? --AxelHecht 08:38, 26 November 2006 (PST)