MozillaQualityAssurance:Web Page Set: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
 
Line 82: Line 82:
== Issues ==
== Issues ==
* For double protection should we be running these pages on a local web server that is firewalled so that it cannot call-out to the live web?
* For double protection should we be running these pages on a local web server that is firewalled so that it cannot call-out to the live web?
* The best results (most accurate reproduction of the live web page) are found by using http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg09142.html
** should we host binaries of this version of wget for the major operating systems?  This would allow people to get better web pages without having to build their own wget


== To Be Resolved ==
== To Be Resolved ==
* How do we account for latency involved in contacting the server for these pages, since we are only interested in how long it takes Firefox to layout and display the page?
* How do we account for latency involved in contacting the server for these pages, since we are only interested in how long it takes Firefox to layout and display the page?
541

edits