Jetpack/Weekly Meeting/2012-07-17: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
** Anything for 1.9b2 that isn't in 1.9b1? Tell Wes soon, or you'll miss the beta!
** Anything for 1.9b2 that isn't in 1.9b1? Tell Wes soon, or you'll miss the beta!
*** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774636 bug 774636] Deprecate Components with message before removing it
*** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774636 bug 774636] Deprecate Components with message before removing it
*** [https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/466 pull 466] Updated runner.js with a better observer's topic for Fennec
** Changes coming to private browsing {{bug|748604}} - needs an owner
** Changes coming to private browsing {{bug|748604}} - needs an owner
* Roundtable
* Roundtable
Line 14: Line 15:
** Wes is working on a new bug dashboard: http://kwierso.github.com/Jetpack-Bugzilla-Organizer/newrewrite/ (Feedback welcome!)
** Wes is working on a new bug dashboard: http://kwierso.github.com/Jetpack-Bugzilla-Organizer/newrewrite/ (Feedback welcome!)
** Would be really cool to use `Target milestone` field in bugzilla when we land the related fix. (And ensure always filling bugs for errors/exception that users can face.)
** Would be really cool to use `Target milestone` field in bugzilla when we land the related fix. (And ensure always filling bugs for errors/exception that users can face.)
** Nigthly support and AMO. Needs to wait for final 1.9 (?) to upload a fix for nightly support.
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683217 bug 683217] ( " {Cu} = require("chrome"); doesn't let you use Cu.import("somejsmodule");" ) has reared its ugly head.


= Bugs =
= Bugs =
Line 34: Line 37:
</bugzilla>
</bugzilla>


= Attendees =  
= Attendees =
 
* Gabor
* Jeff Griffiths
* Wes
* Eddy
* Irakli
* Jeff Hammel
* Erik
* Matteo
* Mossop
* Alex
* Will


= Minutes =
= Minutes =


=== Builder ===
=== Builder ===
* sent email to builder team to make sure they still exist
* 1.8.1 still not up yet - Jeff will talk will clouser


=== SDK ===
=== SDK ===
* Q3 goals: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Jetpack/Goals/2012Q3
** mobile is the focus
** Will: 3rd party modules? Will will look into this.
* UX progress
** lots of work to do
** use mercurial to produce try builds?
* anything for 1.9 beta?
** Matteo - mobile fix
** Irakli - panel is broken on nightly. fixed? 774088
* private Browsing API changes
** erik took the bug
** change to how pb module works, need stats on usage of the old module?
** outreach to 24 users of the module?


=== Roundtable ===
=== Roundtable ===
* re-packs are good, high confidence!
** also have ftp access
** can re-pack to 1.8.1
* nightly support?
** look at releaseing beta / rc signature updates
** jeff to talk to will clouser about weekly releases
** potential first candidate is today's beta.
* we should use target milestone field in bugzilla - easier tracking of bug <==> release!
* Cu.import behaviour differs in SDK
** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683217 bug 683217] reveals this is actually unintended behaviour
** traditional platform devs expext `import *` behaviour, but current behaviour is preferred as it does not blindly pollute the scope.
** options: document current behaviour, implement expected behaviour, implement something else?

Latest revision as of 23:01, 17 July 2012


Agenda

  • Builder
  • SDK
    • Q3 Goals
    • UX progress?
    • Anything for 1.9b2 that isn't in 1.9b1? Tell Wes soon, or you'll miss the beta!
      • bug 774636 Deprecate Components with message before removing it
      • pull 466 Updated runner.js with a better observer's topic for Fennec
    • Changes coming to private browsing bug 748604 - needs an owner
  • Roundtable
    • re-pack progress: ready to go, need to confirm repacking against 1.8.1
    • Jeff -> Brazil
    • Wes is working on a new bug dashboard: http://kwierso.github.com/Jetpack-Bugzilla-Organizer/newrewrite/ (Feedback welcome!)
    • Would be really cool to use `Target milestone` field in bugzilla when we land the related fix. (And ensure always filling bugs for errors/exception that users can face.)
    • Nigthly support and AMO. Needs to wait for final 1.9 (?) to upload a fix for nightly support.
    • bug 683217 ( " {Cu} = require("chrome"); doesn't let you use Cu.import("somejsmodule");" ) has reared its ugly head.

Bugs

Triage Followups

No results.

0 Total; 0 Open (0%); 0 Resolved (0%); 0 Verified (0%);


Open Bugs

Bugzilla query error

Invalid type (count) and display (table) combination1


Attendees

  • Gabor
  • Jeff Griffiths
  • Wes
  • Eddy
  • Irakli
  • Jeff Hammel
  • Erik
  • Matteo
  • Mossop
  • Alex
  • Will

Minutes

Builder

  • sent email to builder team to make sure they still exist
  • 1.8.1 still not up yet - Jeff will talk will clouser

SDK

  • Q3 goals: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Jetpack/Goals/2012Q3
    • mobile is the focus
    • Will: 3rd party modules? Will will look into this.
  • UX progress
    • lots of work to do
    • use mercurial to produce try builds?
  • anything for 1.9 beta?
    • Matteo - mobile fix
    • Irakli - panel is broken on nightly. fixed? 774088
  • private Browsing API changes
    • erik took the bug
    • change to how pb module works, need stats on usage of the old module?
    • outreach to 24 users of the module?

Roundtable

  • re-packs are good, high confidence!
    • also have ftp access
    • can re-pack to 1.8.1
  • nightly support?
    • look at releaseing beta / rc signature updates
    • jeff to talk to will clouser about weekly releases
    • potential first candidate is today's beta.
  • we should use target milestone field in bugzilla - easier tracking of bug <==> release!
  • Cu.import behaviour differs in SDK
    • bug 683217 reveals this is actually unintended behaviour
    • traditional platform devs expext `import *` behaviour, but current behaviour is preferred as it does not blindly pollute the scope.
    • options: document current behaviour, implement expected behaviour, implement something else?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.allizom.org/index.php?title=Jetpack/Weekly_Meeting/2012-07-17&oldid=451768"