canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,043
edits
Update:Archive/2.0/Developers/Review Process: Difference between revisions
Update:Archive/2.0/Developers/Review Process (view source)
Revision as of 00:52, 29 April 2007
, 29 April 2007no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Owner: | {{AmoArchive}} | ||
== Developers == | |||
Owner:<br> | |||
Scott Kveton kveton AT osuosl org | Scott Kveton kveton AT osuosl org | ||
Peers: | Peers:<br> | ||
Mike Morgan morgamic ON irc mozilla org | Mike Morgan morgamic ON irc mozilla org<br> | ||
Mike Connor mconnor AT steelgryphon com | Giorgio Maone g.maone at informaction,com<br> | ||
Mike Connor mconnor AT steelgryphon com<br> | |||
Chris Thomas cst at andrew,cmu,edu | Chris Thomas cst at andrew,cmu,edu | ||
This is not meant to be a final or immutable list. This is a small core, but we will expand as and when it is appropriate. Please note that technical prowess alone is not sufficient here. Sound judgement and communication skills are equally important in the project management process. If someone demonstrates the appropriate set of qualifications, they will be asked to join. | This is not meant to be a final or immutable list. This is a small core, but we will expand as and when it is appropriate. Please note that technical prowess alone is not sufficient here. Sound judgement and communication skills are equally important in the project management process. If someone demonstrates the appropriate set of qualifications, they will be asked to join. | ||
Code Review | == Code Review == | ||
In order to drive 2.0 development, UMO's featureset will not be expanded, save for certain and specific changes to ensure stability/security in an ongoing manner. To that aim, all checkins to 1.0's branch will require two peer reviews and approval from Scott. This is a high standard, but necessary at this stage. | In order to drive 2.0 development, UMO's featureset will not be expanded, save for certain and specific changes to ensure stability/security in an ongoing manner. To that aim, all checkins to 1.0's branch will require two peer reviews and approval from Scott. This is a high standard, but necessary at this stage. | ||