CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-11: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(fix previous link)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<small>[[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-11|&laquo; previous meeting]] | [[CycleCollector/Status_Meetings|index]] | [[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-18|next meeting &raquo;]]</small>
<small>[[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-04|&laquo; previous meeting]] | [[CycleCollector/Status_Meetings|index]] | [[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-18|next meeting &raquo;]]</small>


== Agenda ==
== Agenda ==
Line 11: Line 11:
Last week's next steps:  Wait for patches (first 4 of 5) to land, then test more:
Last week's next steps:  Wait for patches (first 4 of 5) to land, then test more:


* Jonas will write a test case to generate cycles via document.
* Jonas will write a test case to generate cycles via document.  STATUS:  Patch landed and there has been a significan improvement in performance.  Now we're seeing a large majority of time spent in JS GC
 
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368774 Support cycle collection of refcounted non-xpcom objects (aka, the XBL patch)]: in dbaron's review queue.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377884 Switch nsXPConnect::Traverse to use tracing]: waiting for some feedback from Igor, and should be ready for review after that.
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379718 using trace API for reference counts]: probably want to wait with this until after bug 377884 lands.


== Performance requirements ==
== Performance requirements ==
Criteria for Performance Satisfactory:
* Double the current GC time.


== Next steps on leaks ==
== Next steps on leaks ==
* Two patches dbaron's review queue.
* After the two patches, we need to have specific test cases and look for leaks.


== Next steps on performance (pauses) ==
== Next steps on performance (pauses) ==

Latest revision as of 18:51, 18 May 2007

« previous meeting | index | next meeting »

Agenda

  • status of patches in progress
  • performance requirements
  • next steps on performance and on memory leaks

Status of Pending CC Code in Bugzilla

Last week's next steps: Wait for patches (first 4 of 5) to land, then test more:

  • Jonas will write a test case to generate cycles via document. STATUS: Patch landed and there has been a significan improvement in performance. Now we're seeing a large majority of time spent in JS GC

Performance requirements

Criteria for Performance Satisfactory:

  • Double the current GC time.

Next steps on leaks

  • Two patches dbaron's review queue.
  • After the two patches, we need to have specific test cases and look for leaks.

Next steps on performance (pauses)

Next steps on performance (general degradation)