canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,334
edits
CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-11: Difference between revisions
fix previous link
(fix previous link) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<small>[[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05- | <small>[[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-04|« previous meeting]] | [[CycleCollector/Status_Meetings|index]] | [[CycleCollector/CCStatus-2007-05-18|next meeting »]]</small> | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Jonas will write a test case to generate cycles via document. STATUS: Patch landed and there has been a significan improvement in performance. Now we're seeing a large majority of time spent in JS GC | * Jonas will write a test case to generate cycles via document. STATUS: Patch landed and there has been a significan improvement in performance. Now we're seeing a large majority of time spent in JS GC | ||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368774 Support cycle collection of refcounted non-xpcom objects (aka, the XBL patch)]: in dbaron's review queue. | |||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377884 Switch nsXPConnect::Traverse to use tracing]: waiting for some feedback from Igor, and should be ready for review after that. | |||
* [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379718 using trace API for reference counts]: probably want to wait with this until after bug 377884 lands. | |||
== Performance requirements == | == Performance requirements == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
== Next steps on leaks == | == Next steps on leaks == | ||
* Two patches dbaron's review queue. | |||
* After the two patches, we need to have specific test cases and look for leaks. | |||
== Next steps on performance (pauses) == | == Next steps on performance (pauses) == | ||