Talk:Extension Manager:Addon Update Security: Difference between revisions

Question about providing updates without SSL
(added another vote for not requiring updateHashes)
(Question about providing updates without SSL)
Line 43: Line 43:


--[[User:Grimholtz|Grimholtz]] 12:18, 9 July 2007 (PDT)
--[[User:Grimholtz|Grimholtz]] 12:18, 9 July 2007 (PDT)
== No-SSL downloads ==
Am I correct in my assumption that this proposal allows you to get away with not using SSL for any part of the updates process if:
# Sign the updates.rdf file with your private key; install your public key with your .xpi file during the initial install.
# Provide updateHash for each xpi in updates.rdf (that has been signed by your private key).
--[[User:Silfreed|Silfreed]] 19:36, 16 July 2007 (PDT)
7

edits