Standards/license: Difference between revisions
(MIT and BSD are not public-domain-like) |
(→CC0 OWFa Preferred: list out reasons for CC0, link to https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html#Licenses_Compatible_with_the_MPL) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== CC0 OWFa Preferred == | == CC0 OWFa Preferred == | ||
CC0+OWFa is Mozilla's preferred method for licensing for standards specifications for the following reasons: | CC0+OWFa is Mozilla's preferred method for licensing for standards specifications for the following reasons: | ||
* [http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/ CC0] provides maximum < | * [http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/ CC0] provides | ||
* | ** maximum <strong>flexibility</strong> for altering/changing/modifying/discussing specifications | ||
* [http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0 OWFa] provides a standards-body-independent royalty-free patent declaration. | ** ability to <strong>[https://www.mozilla.org/MPL/license-policy.html#Licenses_Compatible_with_the_MPL embed portions of a spec into code]</strong> (which itself may use other open source licenses) | ||
** an <strong>internationally</strong> aware and compatible public domain license. | |||
*** For this reason CC0 is preferred over similar liberal licenses such as other public domain dedications, or the US-centric MIT or BSD licenses (or any variants thereof). | |||
* [http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0 OWFa] provides a standards-body-independent <strong>royalty-free patent declaration</strong>. | |||
== Markup == | == Markup == |
Revision as of 16:14, 30 August 2013
This page describes the licenses that Mozilla prefers to use for standards, in particular, CC0 and OWFa. Mozilla Legal has reviewed the use of CC0 and OWFa, both individually, and in combination and approved them for use with standards specifications. — Tantek (talk)
CC0 OWFa Preferred
CC0+OWFa is Mozilla's preferred method for licensing for standards specifications for the following reasons:
- CC0 provides
- maximum flexibility for altering/changing/modifying/discussing specifications
- ability to embed portions of a spec into code (which itself may use other open source licenses)
- an internationally aware and compatible public domain license.
- For this reason CC0 is preferred over similar liberal licenses such as other public domain dedications, or the US-centric MIT or BSD licenses (or any variants thereof).
- OWFa provides a standards-body-independent royalty-free patent declaration.
Markup
You may use the following markup in specifications to indicate that they are published with the CC0+OWFa dual license:
HTML
<p class="copyright"><small> <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/"> <img alt="CC0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/p/zero/1.0/80x15.png"> </a> To the extent possible under law, the editors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work. In addition, as of (today's date), the editors have made this specification available under the <a rel="license" href="http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0"> Open Web Foundation Agreement Version 1.0</a>, which is available at http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0. </small></p>
MediaWiki
<small>Per [http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ CC0], to the extent possible under law, the editors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this work. In addition, as of {{CURRENTYEAR}}-{{CURRENTMONTH}}-{{CURRENTDAY2}}, the editors have made this specification available under the [http://www.openwebfoundation.org/legal/the-owf-1-0-agreements/owfa-1-0 Open Web Foundation Agreement Version 1.0].</small>
Example Specifications
Here are some specifications that use CC0+OWFa:
- IndieAuth.com:
- microformats.org:
- WHATWG: