Confirmed users
2,615
edits
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
== Exported APIs == | == Exported APIs == | ||
* Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.) | * Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.) | ||
** APIs | |||
*** exported to the web: navigator.registerProtocolHandler, any URI referencing attribute (href, src, etc.) | |||
*** exported to XPCOM: nsIHandlerInfo, nsI{Web,Local,}HandlerApp, nsIHandlerService | |||
** UI -- see the UI design documentation section | |||
* Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so? | * Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so? | ||
Yes, as per the WhatWG spec. It simply url-encodes the URI to be sent, and replaces the "%s" in the handler string with that in a GET request. | |||
* Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics. | * Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics. | ||
mime-types.rdf has been extended slightly to allow for multiple possible application handlers per type, and for support URI schemes in addition to MIME types. The mime-types.rdf handling code has been largely contained behind well tested interfaces. At some point, the hope is to replace them with a mozStorage database instead. | |||
* Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully? | * Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully? | ||
Yes, in the IDL. They are not documented on devmo. | |||
* Does it change any existing interfaces? | * Does it change any existing interfaces? | ||
Yes. nsIMIMEInfo now inherits from nsIHandlerInfo; nsIHandlerInfo can also be used directly to represent a protocol handler. Furthermore, the old hidden prefs for protocol handling app configure on Unix have been removed, now that there's UI for this. | |||
== Web Compatibility == | == Web Compatibility == | ||
* Does the feature had any impact on Web compatibility? | * Does the feature had any impact on Web compatibility? |