Confirmed users
2,615
edits
Protocol: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Schedule and Weekly Goals = | = Schedule and Weekly Goals = | ||
* Sept 19th | * Sept 19th | ||
** review phpical code | ** <strike>review phpical code</strike> | ||
** review possible svn structure | ** <strike>review possible svn structure</strike> | ||
** check it into svn | ** <strike>check it into svn</strike> | ||
** work on trimming it down | ** <strike>work on trimming it down</strike> | ||
** figure out threading concern / mutual exclusion | ** <strike>figure out threading concern / mutual exclusion</strike> non-issue now | ||
* Sept 26th | * Sept 26th | ||
** set up test server for public eval | ** <strike>set up test server for public eval</strike> | ||
** set up test plan | ** <strike>set up test plan</strike> | ||
** refine code | ** <strike>refine code</strike> | ||
** public testing feedback and bug fixing | ** <strike>public testing feedback and bug fixing</strike> | ||
* Oct 3rd | * Oct 3rd | ||
** evaluate if ready for push to production | ** <strike>evaluate if ready for push to production</strike> | ||
** coordinate with IT to set up "production" instance | ** <strike>coordinate with IT to set up "production" instance</strike> | ||
= Bugs = | = Bugs = | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
= Background = | = Background = | ||
* [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/browse_thread/thread/bf9bdc6092e21281/6398d5bea1194738?lnk=gst&q=protocol+handler+webcal&rnum=1#6398d5bea1194738 Dmose's initial newsgroup post that started all this] | * [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.apps.firefox/browse_thread/thread/bf9bdc6092e21281/6398d5bea1194738?lnk=gst&q=protocol+handler+webcal&rnum=1#6398d5bea1194738 Dmose's initial newsgroup post that started all this] | ||
= Notes = | |||
* Given that when we ship M8, the URL in question will be accessible from M8, but will simply fail to resolve or 404 (though I suppose we could easily enough put up a static web page), I'd argue that spending a week on testing this isn't really worth it, since the entire purpose here is simply to test Mozilla. I'd argue that once it seems to be working and we're convincedthere's no obvious huge security holes, we should just go live. --dmose | |||
= Presence in the Beta Review Guide = | |||
It's been suggested that we highlight web-based protocol handling in the beta review guide. For this, I think we want to do at least the following things: | |||
* warn IT that traffic might go up which could cause scaling issues | |||
* link to documentation (current MDC page, WhatWG page) | |||
* ping evang re web-based protocol handler tutorial pages | |||