Mobile/Testing/12 04 13: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→A Team) |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== IT == | == IT == | ||
== A Team == | == A Team == | ||
* tegra failure rate: [[http://54.215.155.53/android_failures.html?platform=android2.2 1.22%]] | |||
* panda failure rate: [[http://54.215.155.53/android_failures.html?platform=android4.0 13.6%]] | |||
** excluding retries: 2.03 | |||
* Working on {{Bug|937637}} to get cpp unittests scheduled on trunk trees | |||
* Can't attend this week due to a conflict | |||
== x86 automation == | == x86 automation == | ||
* All tests running hidden on Cedar, with some failures | * All tests running hidden on Cedar, with some failures |
Revision as of 16:46, 4 December 2013
Previous Action Items
- snorp to try again to repro canvasmark failures on panda
- rel-eng to test sut 1.20 in staging
- callek to disable canvasmark on pandas -- bug 916258
- jmaher to follow-up with blassey on talos -- bug 941155
Status reports
Dev team
Rel Eng
- graydon has a spot on Ash to mess with Android 2.3 testing on EC2
IT
A Team
- Working on bug 937637 to get cpp unittests scheduled on trunk trees
- Can't attend this week due to a conflict
x86 automation
- All tests running hidden on Cedar, with some failures
- Complete:
- kvm enabled and deployed: bug 929048
- chunks coalesced, sets coalesced: bug 935214
- patched emulator deployed: bug 933918
- S1 split into 2 sets and output no longer duplicated: bug 939823
- new AVD definitions (Graydon's) deployed: bug 919812
- Working on:
- cleaning up remaining failures: bug 936226
Autophone
Eideticker
Round Table
- (armenzg) Re-thinking our Mobile testing
- see http://blog.drapostles.org/archives/107 for info
We have awful wait times on Tegras
- We currently test Android 2.2 on Tegras
- However, only less than 2% of our users are using Android 2.2
- graydon is helping us to have an Android 2.3 story (10.82%-14.22% of our users)
- We currently test Armv6 builds (~2% of users) and no-ion (we don't ship this - only b2g18 branches)
- I want to know if we can have a not-per-checkin model testing for Armv6
- This would improve our current 2.2 testing on Tegras
I think we're OK with Pandas wrt to capacity, however, I want to point out that 4.1 has passed 4.0 in number of users.