MDN/Development/Redesign/Whitespace: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Reducing White Space in the MDN Design=
=Reducing White Space in the MDN Design=
There is a bug open to track progress on that topic: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=947835 Bug 947835]


==Add screenshots with notes here==
==Add screenshots with notes here==
Line 72: Line 74:


N. Like for the home page, I made the footer clearly visible with a background (really made the footer transparent so the background of the page appear). It works well here. I didn't checked Zone pages which will have a strong blue here (or other later). Maybe we should have grey for them too?
N. Like for the home page, I made the footer clearly visible with a background (really made the footer transparent so the background of the page appear). It works well here. I didn't checked Zone pages which will have a strong blue here (or other later). Maybe we should have grey for them too?
==== Article, with attachments, bottom ====
[[File:Article_attachments_bottom.png|1000px}}
O. As the table is a strong clue for a section break, I was able to remove the border, margin and padding of the next box. Note that the behaviour of this box is different when there are no attachment (see point K.) and when there are some.


=== Comment from Jeremie ===
=== Comment from Jeremie ===
Line 82: Line 87:


In the second image check the line spacing at the top (seriously shrink) and the position of the TOC.
In the second image check the line spacing at the top (seriously shrink) and the position of the TOC.
==== Comments by Jean-Yves about the TOC move ====
I'm very interested in this change. It goes in the way in making an article "in a box" and make it have a much more clearly delimitation. If we go that way, we shouldn't do this change alone, we should study where to put the title of the article when we have quicklinks.
I have no definitive opinion on this, but I think it is worth investigating.
== Editing Article ==
=== Below Content ===
There's a lot of whitespace at the bottom of editing an article. The four minor actions (tags, revision reason, attachments, and the 'review needed' checkboxes take up a full screen height, but have excessive amounts of whitespace between each action (vertically). Kill most of it, and it'll be easier to use edit. Preferably, all of the editing options at the bottom of the page should fit in one screen along with the footer, so that if I scroll all the way down, I can see all of them. --[[User:Havvy|Havvy]] ([[User talk:Havvy|talk]]) 07:05, 26 November 2013 (PST)
Confirmed users
43

edits