Firefox3/Security Review Template: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
* feature-tracking bug links
* feature-tracking bug links
* specs or design docs
* specs or design docs


== Security and Privacy ==
== Security and Privacy ==
* What security issues do you address in your project?
* Is this feature a security feature?  If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve?
* What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed?
* Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
* Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
* Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
* Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
* How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled?
== Exported APIs ==
== Exported APIs ==
* Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
* Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
Line 17: Line 19:
* Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
* Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
* Does it change any existing interfaces?
* Does it change any existing interfaces?
== Module interactions ==
* What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)?
== Data ==
* What data is read or parsed by this feature?
* What is the output of this feature?
* What storage formats are used?
== Reliability ==
== Reliability ==
* What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
* What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
* Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?
* Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?


== Installation, Upgrade/Downgrade/Sidegrade, and platform requirements ==
== Configuration ==
* Does it equally support all Tier-1 platforms?
* Does is have a hardware requirement (or increase minimum requirements)?
* Does it require changes to the installer?
* Does it impact updates?
*list the expected behavior of this feature/function when Firefox is upgraded to a newer minor release, downgraded by installation of an earlier revision, or re-installed (same version)
 
== configuration ==
* Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
* Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
* Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
* Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
* What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
* What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
* What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?
* What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?
== Relationships to other projects - are there related projects in the community? ==
 
== Relationships to other projects ==
Are there related projects in the community?
* If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
* If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
* Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?
* Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?
== Review comments ==
[[Category:Wikipage templates]]

Latest revision as of 17:44, 1 October 2014

Overview

Describe the goals and objectives of the feature here.

Background links

  • feature-tracking bug links
  • specs or design docs

Security and Privacy

  • Is this feature a security feature? If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve?
  • What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed?
  • Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
  • Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
  • How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled?

Exported APIs

  • Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
  • Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so?
  • Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics.
  • Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
  • Does it change any existing interfaces?

Module interactions

  • What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)?

Data

  • What data is read or parsed by this feature?
  • What is the output of this feature?
  • What storage formats are used?

Reliability

  • What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
  • Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?

Configuration

  • Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
  • Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
  • What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
  • What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?

Relationships to other projects

Are there related projects in the community?

  • If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
  • Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?

Review comments