Netpolicy/Take2: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(adding in new draft for content)
m (word tweaks)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
=Public policy and advocacy at Mozilla=
=Public policy and advocacy at Mozilla=


insert description here
Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.


==Issues and Activities==
==Issues and Activities==
The Internet policy issues we engage with fall into two broad pillars of activity: trust and openness.
The Internet policy issues we engage with fall into two broad pillars of activity: trust and openness.
<!-- Add in link to resources / collected past actions page here -->


===Trust + integrity===
===Trust + integrity===
Line 12: Line 13:
* Security public policy - finding opportunities for change advocacy that go above and beyond information sharing and risk management, including fighting for the continued freedom of users to communicate securely, without backdoors
* Security public policy - finding opportunities for change advocacy that go above and beyond information sharing and risk management, including fighting for the continued freedom of users to communicate securely, without backdoors
* Privacy - continuing leadership on raising public awareness of privacy to build a better, more open Internet future
* Privacy - continuing leadership on raising public awareness of privacy to build a better, more open Internet future
* Data collection and use - creating counter-incentives for excessive collection, and/or incentives for better data stewardship and management, including:
* Data collection and use - evangelizing and advocating for better data stewardship and management
** Awareness, education and literacy, e.g. Lightbeam, Privacy Coach
* Engaging with other issues as they develop globally
** Direct empowerment, e.g. DNT, tracking protection (Polaris)
** Policy, e.g. standardizing/harmonizing privacy protections
** Experiment w/ privacy-friendly advertising, data practices, e.g. Tiles, UP
* Other issues as they develop globally, e.g. “Right to Forget”


===Openness + innovation===
===Openness + innovation===
Our work on openness and innovation includes, but goes beyond, net neutrality and intellectual property, centering around the values of competition, interoperability, and innovation. Active issues in this pillar include:
Our work on openness and innovation includes, but goes beyond, net neutrality and intellectual property, centering around the values of competition, interoperability, and innovation. Active issues in this pillar include:
* Net neutrality - protecting the Internet’s status quo of a level playing field to promote innovation, competition, and user choice
* Net neutrality - protecting the Internet’s status quo of a level playing field to promote innovation, competition, and user choice
* Copyright - engaging in U.S. and E.U. conversations with the objective of strengthening fair use and interoperability to promote technology innovation
* Copyright - taking part in U.S. and E.U. conversations with the objective of strengthening fair use and safe harbors for intermediary liability to promote technology innovation
* Patent - process reforms to discourage excessive and anti-innovation litigation, paired with targeted advocacy efforts around vague, broad software patents
* Patent - supporting process reforms to discourage excessive and anti-innovation litigation, paired with targeted advocacy efforts around software patent scope
* Interoperability - cross-cutting IP and other issues, siloing of technologies creates gatekeepers and potential for multidisciplinary work on interoperability
* Interoperability - advocating for interoperability (including but not limited to in the context of IP) in a world of technology silos and new gatekeepers
* Internet governance - global Internet governance forums and structures are ever shifting, creating potential for change, despite glacial pace of processes
* Internet governance - engaging with ever shifting global Internet governance forums and structures, seeking potential for impact despite glacial pace of change
* Access - new Internet users are born every day, some through low-cost Firefox OS smartphones; policy has some opportunities to accelerate adoption more
* Access - developing strategies to connect new Internet users to the global open Web
* Telecom - spectrum, competition, IP transition, and over-the-top services create opportunities for effective advocacy + leadership for the right independent voice
* Telecom - monitoring a variety of issues in spectrum, competition, IP transition, and over-the-top services


==Meetings and Mailing Lists==
==Forums==
The primary open forum for Mozilla public policy and Advocacy Community engagement is [https://discourse.mozilla-advocacy.org/ Discourse]. Discourse includes open discussion of policy issues, along with project and job opportunities and other engagements.


===Mailing List===
We also have a [https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/netpolicy mailing list], open to any Mozillian or invited guest. Archives are viewable by list members. Historically, this mailing list was the primary place for discussion of policy issues.
https://discourse.mozilla-advocacy.org/
Open forum for Mozilla public policy and Advocacy Community engagement, including open discussion of policy issues along with project and job opportunities and other engagements.
 
We also have a [https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/netpolicy mailing list], open to any Mozillian or invited guest. Archives are viewable by list members. Historically, this mailing list was the primary place for discussion. Recently, we have been trying to encourage greater use of Discourse as a substitute,


==New Ideas==
==New Ideas==


replace this with updated info - check level of heading as well
If you have an Internet policy issue that you think Mozilla should consider intervening in, please submit it for consideration via our [http://mzl.la/policysupport Policy Support form] or [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/form.ipp Bugzilla]. Please consider the 'Purpose' section below, as well as the issue areas of interest above, in making your submission.  
 
If you have policy issues or topics in this area that you think Mozilla should consider intervening on or which need support, please [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/form.ipp submit them for consideration]. Before doing so, you might want to read the "Purpose" section to make sure it falls within our remit.  


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
Line 53: Line 45:
When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.
When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.


In terms of regulating the Web, the primary challenge for any legislative process is anticipating unintended consequences, given the complexities inherent in the Web, its architecture, the relationships between its many stakeholders and the pace of innovation.
'''Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.''' We want to empower anyone to join us, and become a champion and steward of the healthy Web, to help ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2 billion people who join.
 
'''The Mozilla Public Policy Module works with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and take action when the Web’s DNA is threatened.''' We want to empower anyone to become a steward of the healthy Web and ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2 billion people who join.


===So what do we do?===
===So what do we do?===
Line 61: Line 51:
We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web:
We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web:


* without compromising core code and product efforts
* without compromising core code and product efforts,
* only when Mozilla can add extra value
* only when Mozilla can add extra value,
* directly or indirectly
* directly or indirectly.
 
We aren't a typical lobby shop - not even close. We do have and maintain relationships, and we understand and think about politics. But we focus our engagement on issues, in contexts, and at times where we can dive deep, work strategically, and have outsize impact.


===How do we do it?===
===How do we do it?===
Line 69: Line 61:
We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:
We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:


* educate and inform
* educate and inform,
* organize and convene
* organize and convene,
* enable and support
* enable and support,
* advocate and engage
* advocate and engage, and
* hack, code and implement
* hack, code and implement.


We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.
We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.


==Past Issues and Activities==
==Join us==
 
review and update the below, and convert to a separate page for a repository of past actions for reference - link to advocacy subpage?
 
===Marco Civil===
 
* https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2013/04/16/marco-civil/
 
===SOPA and ACTA===
 
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/01/17/mozilla-to-join-tomorrows-virtual-protests-of-pipasopa/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/sopa-the-stop-online-piracy-act-is-it-really-dangerous/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/homeland-security-request-to-take-down-mafiaafire-add-on/
*http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121210/06543921321/mozilla-helped-to-stop-sopa-january-now-its-worried-about-wcit.shtml
 
===ITU/WCIT===
 
*https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ITU/
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2012/12/12/the-tragedy-of-the-itu/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/12/02/why-is-itu-governance-of-the-internet-a-bad-idea/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/11/29/the-itu-and-you/
 
===Net Neutrality===
 
*https://wiki.mozilla.org/Netpolicy/Net_neutrality
 
===Browser Market Competition===
 
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2009/08/17/proposed-microsoft-ec-settlement/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/thoughts-on-microsoft%E2%80%99s-settlement-proposal-in-the-european-commission%E2%80%99s-tying-investigation/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/thoughts-on-microsoft%E2%80%99s-settlement-proposal-in-the-european-commission%E2%80%99s-tying-investigation/
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/10/30/windows-eu-ballot-screen-technical-glitch/
 
===DMCA/Copyright/Jailbreaking===
 
*http://www.pcworld.com/article/159822/iphone_jailbreak.html
*https://twitter.com/chefhja/status/201014228293910528
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/comments-supporting-dmca-jailbreaking-exemption/
 
===Encryption and Open Source===
 
*http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/18/234248/mozilla-firefox-not-in-violation-of-us-export-rules
*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2011/01/21/recent-changes-in-us-crypto-export-rules/
 
===Trust and Privacy===
 
*http://www.ibtimes.com/firefox-maker-mozilla-named-most-trusted-internet-company-privacy-2012-1045844
*https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2012/07/03/mozilla-testifies-at-us-senate-commerce-hearing-on-do-not-track/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/category/privacy/
*https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2009/09/21/keeping-you-and-me-at-the-center-of-things/
<!--
===Do Not Track===
-->
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2013/01/28/newdntui/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/privacy/2012/05/17/do-not-track-gains-more-support-around-the-web/
*https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/files/2014/07/Mozilla-Commerce-Committee-Testimony-Privacy-June-2012.pdf
*https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/files/2014/07/Mozilla-Statement-April-24-2013-Commerce-Committee-Do-Not-Track.pdf
*https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/files/2014/07/Mozilla-Responses-to-Senate-Questions-May-31-Do-Not-Track.pdf
 
===Software Patents===


*http://lockshot.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/patent-matters-dont-hate-the-player-hate-the-game/
To learn more about how you can help us take action, visit our [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Netpolicy/advocacy Advocacy] page.

Latest revision as of 17:13, 10 February 2016

Public policy and advocacy at Mozilla

Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA.

Issues and Activities

The Internet policy issues we engage with fall into two broad pillars of activity: trust and openness.

Trust + integrity

Our work on trust and integrity policy begins with the established external contexts of surveillance reform and privacy, working to develop the values of control, transparency, and privacy. Active issues in this pillar of our work include:

  • Surveillance reform - touching on a multifaceted set of geographic and legal contexts, and a range of active, unresolved issues
  • Security public policy - finding opportunities for change advocacy that go above and beyond information sharing and risk management, including fighting for the continued freedom of users to communicate securely, without backdoors
  • Privacy - continuing leadership on raising public awareness of privacy to build a better, more open Internet future
  • Data collection and use - evangelizing and advocating for better data stewardship and management
  • Engaging with other issues as they develop globally

Openness + innovation

Our work on openness and innovation includes, but goes beyond, net neutrality and intellectual property, centering around the values of competition, interoperability, and innovation. Active issues in this pillar include:

  • Net neutrality - protecting the Internet’s status quo of a level playing field to promote innovation, competition, and user choice
  • Copyright - taking part in U.S. and E.U. conversations with the objective of strengthening fair use and safe harbors for intermediary liability to promote technology innovation
  • Patent - supporting process reforms to discourage excessive and anti-innovation litigation, paired with targeted advocacy efforts around software patent scope
  • Interoperability - advocating for interoperability (including but not limited to in the context of IP) in a world of technology silos and new gatekeepers
  • Internet governance - engaging with ever shifting global Internet governance forums and structures, seeking potential for impact despite glacial pace of change
  • Access - developing strategies to connect new Internet users to the global open Web
  • Telecom - monitoring a variety of issues in spectrum, competition, IP transition, and over-the-top services

Forums

The primary open forum for Mozilla public policy and Advocacy Community engagement is Discourse. Discourse includes open discussion of policy issues, along with project and job opportunities and other engagements.

We also have a mailing list, open to any Mozillian or invited guest. Archives are viewable by list members. Historically, this mailing list was the primary place for discussion of policy issues.

New Ideas

If you have an Internet policy issue that you think Mozilla should consider intervening in, please submit it for consideration via our Policy Support form or Bugzilla. Please consider the 'Purpose' section below, as well as the issue areas of interest above, in making your submission.

Purpose

What's Mozilla's role in public policy?

Mozilla believes the Web should be open and available to everyone, and this openness is essential to a healthy cyber economy. We focus on advancing key characteristics of the open Web, not specific functions like social media or videos, which will always be in flux.

The strength of the Web and its economy rests on a number of core building blocks that make up its foundational DNA. Think of them as requirements to support a full range of social, business, governmental, and educational interactions and communications that underlie the importance of the Web in our lives today.

When these building blocks are threatened, the overall health and well-being of the Web are put at risk. For instance, recent attempts to change copyright through SOPA in the US and ACTA around the world undermine the distributed nature of the Web, its interoperability, security, and ultimately the rights of users themselves. Another example is attempts by network operators to block, degrade or discriminate the flow of data across their systems, which threaten to restrict access to the Web and degrade the resilience of the Internet for millions of users.

Mozilla public policy works with other teams at Mozilla and with our community of users and developers to provide products and services that make the Web more robust, and to take action when there are opportunities to protect and strengthen the Web’s DNA. We want to empower anyone to join us, and become a champion and steward of the healthy Web, to help ensure its open characteristics remain intact for the next 2 billion people who join.

So what do we do?

We engage in public affairs matters when Mozilla can make a difference by both advancing and defending the web:

  • without compromising core code and product efforts,
  • only when Mozilla can add extra value,
  • directly or indirectly.

We aren't a typical lobby shop - not even close. We do have and maintain relationships, and we understand and think about politics. But we focus our engagement on issues, in contexts, and at times where we can dive deep, work strategically, and have outsize impact.

How do we do it?

We'll use a variety of techniques, tools and assets depending on the situation and what's at stake to express our voice when and where it matters. The action steps include:

  • educate and inform,
  • organize and convene,
  • enable and support,
  • advocate and engage, and
  • hack, code and implement.

We will do these things in concert with Mozilla community members and like minded organizations spread across the globe.

Join us

To learn more about how you can help us take action, visit our Advocacy page.