Firefox/Projects/Network Error Pages: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (→‎Summary: typo)
 
(52 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


When a requested web page cannot be loaded, Firefox should display an error page that not only describes the problem, but which also presents the user with tools to resolve the issue.  It also makes sense to extend this functionality to webserver 404 (File not found) responses as well.
When a requested web page cannot be loaded, Firefox should display an error page that not only describes the problem, but which also presents the user with tools to resolve the issue.  It also makes sense to extend this functionality to webserver 404 (File not found) responses as well.
Implementation is being tracked in {{bug|482874}}


=Introduction=
=Introduction=


When Firefox cannot display a requested web page because of a network error, it shows a network error page.  This page describes the problem, but it offers only one “tool” for resolving the problem, the ‘’’Try Again’’’ button.  This is of limited utility, in fact, for a large class of errors, this is the one thing guaranteed not to work (cf. misspelled URLs).  A better network error page would provide a variety of tools for resolving the problem.
When Firefox cannot display a requested web page because of a network error, it currently shows a network error page.  This page describes the problem and gives advice on how to fix it, but it currently offers only one "tool" for resolving the problem: the "Try Again" button.  This is of limited utility, and for a large class of errors, this is guaranteed not to work (eg. misspelled URLs).  A better network error page would provide the user with useful tools towards guiding them to the content they wanted.


Additionally, web pages that result in 404 errors have a lot in common with network error pages, except that the error page is provided by the server.  In many case this is a default 404 error page for the server which is not very helpful.  The other major browsers will substitute a browser-provided 404 error page in many cases (the typical rule seems to be not to override server-provided error pages over about 500 bytes in length, since those are likely to be customized).  Firefox should provide similar functionality.
Additionally, web pages that result in 404 errors have a lot in common with network error pages, except that the error page is provided by the server.  In many cases this is a default 404 error page for the server which is not very helpful.  The other major browsers will substitute a browser-provided 404 error page in many cases (the typical rule seems to be not to override server-provided error pages over about 500 bytes in length, since those are likely to be customized).  Firefox should provide similar functionality.


=Team=
=Team=
Line 15: Line 17:
  johnath  technical advisor
  johnath  technical advisor
  beltzner  Google Link Doctor liaison
  beltzner  Google Link Doctor liaison
ashughes  QA contact


=Target Release=
=Target Release=


Firefox.next (Firefox 3.6?)
Firefox.next (Firefox 3.6?)
=Competitive Analysis=
All of the current browsers present network error pages for DNS errors.  All of the major browsers offer information about why the error message is being presented linked from the error itself.  Chrome and Safari offer a Google searchbox for the address bar input.
Chrome is the only browser to currently offer useful tools in a 404 page.  It uses Google link doctor to find possible matches both for subdirectories and domains.
Internet Explorer and Chrome offer branded 404 pages, while Safari, Opera, and Firefox 3.5 display the default Apache warnings.
For inputs that do not connect to webpages, Internet Explorer sometimes directs the user to search - previously Microsoft Live Search, now "Bing."
<big>[https://wiki.mozilla.org/images/f/fd/404_poster.png Chart of network error pages in different browsers]</big>
=Experimental Builds=
==== Try Server Build ====
https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/jdolske@mozilla.com-try-442e0af518fd/ 
I finally have a Try Server build with 404 redirection and a new 404 error page.  Alas, this new 404 page looks pretty similar to the old network error page (no fancy LinkDoctor stuff or anything).  It does have the new background image, which I still think is cool.
Note that I've only tested the Mac build.
It has a 512 byte 404-redirect threshold similar to Chrome and IE.  I've been using http://www.almostinfinite.com/foobar (overrides) and http://www.seattlepi.com/foobar (shows the site 404 page) as test URLs.
==== 404 Extension ====
A Firefox Extension which overrides 404 pages and supplies information from Google Link Doctor can be found [https://people.mozilla.org/~beltzner/temp/friendly-error-v1.xpi here].  Note that the 404-override mechanism is currently pretty crude, and it just has a test UI for displaying all the data returned by Link Doctor.  I've only tested it on Firefox 3.5, but it should probably work on Firefox 3.0 as well.  It's safe to install it on your default profile, but you may not want to leave it installed.


=Status=
=Status=
Line 25: Line 55:
* Initial page design for DNS Not Found and 404 errors with Places-based suggestions, Search, and Try Again.
* Initial page design for DNS Not Found and 404 errors with Places-based suggestions, Search, and Try Again.
* Entity definitions for the initial page design have been added to "netError.dtd".
* Entity definitions for the initial page design have been added to "netError.dtd".
* Now have a C++ implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance algorithm, which is accessible in Places Sqlite queries.
* Now have a C++ implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance algorithm (finding nearest string matches), which is accessible in Places Sqlite queries.
* 404 errors are intercepted and redirected to the new error page, but only the Places-based suggestions feature is functional.
* 404 errors are intercepted and redirected to the new error page, but only the Places-based suggestions feature is functional.
* DNS Not Found errors use the new page design, but it’s not functional at all yet.
* DNS Not Found errors use the new page design, but it’s not functional at all yet.
Line 62: Line 92:
=Caveats, Restrictions, Outstanding Questions=
=Caveats, Restrictions, Outstanding Questions=


* Wholesale override of 404 pages would be unpopular, and there is no reliable way to tell the difference between a 404 error page provided by a default install of the web server and a custom 404 error page.  The other major browsers seem to look at file size and if it’s below a certain threshold, assume that it’s a default page and overridable.  Additionally a Firefox override might be useful even for custom error pages in some circumstances.
* Wholesale override of 404 pages would be unpopular, and there is no reliable way to tell the difference between a 404 error page provided by a default install of the web server and a custom 404 error page.  The other major browsers seem to look at file size and if it's below a certain threshold, assume that it's a default page and overridable.  Additionally a Firefox override might be useful even for custom error pages in some circumstances.
* The old error page, by design, runs without chrome privileges, and the new page must also be chromeless.  This is to prevent an XSS attach from escalating into a privilege escalation attack.
* The old error page, by design, runs without chrome privileges, and the new page must also be chromeless.  This is to prevent an XSS attack from escalating into a privilege escalation attack.
* There are privacy issues around using Google Link Doctor that will need to be addressed if we are to use it automatically.
* There are privacy issues around using Google Link Doctor that will need to be addressed if we are to use it automatically.
* The current 404 error page interception/redirection code just does a document.location.replace on EndDocumentLoad to redirect to the Firefox 404 error page.  This has some  limitations, and it may be necessary support this functionality at deeper level in the docshell.  This should be possible in the Firefox.next timeframe.
* The current 404 error page interception/redirection code just does a document.location.replace on EndDocumentLoad to redirect to the Firefox 404 error page.  This has some  limitations, and it may be necessary support this functionality at deeper level in the docshell.  This should be possible in the Firefox.next timeframe.
* One click access to the original server-supplied 404 error page might be desirable.
* One click access to the original server-supplied 404 error page might be desirable.
* We could provide xx
=UI Designs=
UI designs have been broken up into two categories: official designs, and speculative designs.  Official designs are displayed first, in reverse chronological order, so that the current design target is obvious.  Speculative designs are below, also in reverse chronological order, since that’s the most likely order they will be discussed in.  "Out-of-date" designs may get deleted as work progresses.
==Design Questions==
* Is it possible to link to a page with more information about the problem?
* Should indication that the error is "404" or “DNS Not Found” be provided in the first screen?
* How many alternatives should be shown, and how closely should those match user input?
* What distinction should be drawn from the user's perspective between 404 errors and “DNS Not Found” errors?
* Which tools should be provided?
==The Official UI Design==
 
[[Image:Dns error 2.png]]
* Unfortunately, there don't seem to be many useful tools we can provide here, beyond a suggestion and a search.
* It's been noted that having only one suggestion on this page as a bulleted item is visually jarring. Earlier mockups had this - my logic was that using this standard format means there's consistency between this and the 404 page above it, which could be brought to the other warnings. Also, this simple bullet list of "tools" can be easily expanded as new link tools may be added. However, I moved it back in this version and lined up the search box. Basically I thought that with only four elements it was too much to vary the indentation and spacing of them all. So if there were more than one "suggestion" it would go back to the 404 format above, but here there's only one (searching Google), so all is left aligned.
* Next step: links to a page with an explanation of the error and more details of what might have gone wrong
[[Image:New spacing dns.png]]
This is a design taking into account some recent decisions based on what could be done for the code freeze vs trunk:
* The middle block of text can't be altered except as a whole piece, and since there's not enough time to make a separate website explaining DNS error, removing it could leave a newer lost - it's kept in this mockup
* Google search can be added - it's given as a prominent option and the most visually distinctive of the options
* Try again is still present. I experimented making it a button much like it is now and like "Search" is after Google search, but that didn't really work into the style of a bullet list well
==Speculative UI Designs==
----------------------------
----------------------------
----------------------------


=Design=
==Quick-Iteration, No Linkdoctor version: Smallpox 0.1==
For the first "designed" version of 404 pages, Google Linkdoctor won't be used and a page with additional information won't be available.  The tools at our disposal are simply the Places data, which can rank results by how well they match the input.  No matter what matches are found, the domain-level link will be offered.


These designs will be used with the 404 extension [http://people.mozilla.org/~cbartley/network-error-pages-sprint/friendly-error-extension/friendly-error-v13.xpi here], and Firefox custom build [https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/cbartley@mozilla.com-sqlite_edit_distance/ here].


===Two good Places matches===
[[Image:twoplacesmatches.png|500px]]


===One good Places match===
[[Image:oneplacesmatch.png|500px]]


===No good Places matches===
[[Image:noplacesmatches.png|500px]]


<big>[https://intranet.mozilla.org/File:404_error_bg_placeholder.png Background image placeholder]</big>


==Future sketches==
[[Image:Linkdoctor with colored background sketch.png|500px]]
Some tools are fetched via places data, others with Google Linkdoctor, in descending order of the strength of the match.  Troubleshooting and extra information is linked to, but not displayed.


<gallery>
Image:Small screen friendly blue.png|Designed for smaller screens, this error hugs the upper left corner
Image:Bright_colors_with_icon.png|Brightly colored design
</gallery>


==Design Decisions==
*A Branded Firefox 404 page should override default Apache error warnings.
**We believe that overriding default 404 error pages is in the best interest of the user.  While these pages can occasionally be useful to some users for testing, for most users they provide very little; an explanation that only makes sense to technical users, the name of the server, and no tools.  If this page could be substituted for a page that gives intelligent suggestions and a better explanation, it would be useful both to experienced users and new users.
**Currently, IE and Chrome override 404 pages, while Safari, Opera, and Firefox do not.  While there's no way (?) to automatically check if a 404 page is the default Apache one, IE and Chrome place a limit of bytes and direct to their branded 404 pages if the result is less than that.
*More information about the error and suggestions should be provided to users, but on a link off of the network error page rather than written on it directly.
**Even beginning users do not need to see this information every time there is a network warning.  They may want to read this information the first few times, or refer back to it later, but it's unlikely to be very helpful most times the user accesses this page.
**Expert users will need this information rarely or never at all, while tools have a better chance of being useful
**Removing suggestions and information from the error warning makes it easier for the user to see and access tools, which are more useful more often
**This follows previous conventions; on all major operating systems, error warnings provide a link to more information.


= Overview =
* The error code (404, DNS Not Found, etc) does not need to be displayed on the main error page.
'''Sprint lead:''' curtis <br/>
**The goal in the main text should be to explain as clearly and simply as possible to the user what is wrong.  While both error codes and text would explain the problem to experienced users, error codes do not explain the problem to beginning users. 
'''Sprinters:''' johnath, boriss
**The main reason for including error codes is diagnosis.  For instance, if an experienced user needs to know which particular error he is looking at, or if a beginning user is trying to get help from an experienced user, these codes would be important.  However, considering adding the code to the main page provides little benefit in most cases and the same benefit can be had putting the error code on a separate page, including it with the extra information and recommendations could be a better way to preserve this information.
* The network error pages should display the most useful* tools possible for the given input, but no more than five tools.
**<nowiki>*</nowiki>Most useful will be determined an inexact science of approximation of a "best match," given the tools we have available.  For instance, if a page is only one letter off from the user's input, it would have a higher "usefulness" score than simply linking a failed subdirectory to the domain-level page
**Non-current (cached, stored, etc) pages will be displayed last


'''Description:'''
==Basic Structure==
<blockquote>More useful/helpful set of network error pages that offer tools helping users get to a useful end point via search, analysis of Places DB, or automatic redirects/reloads.</blockquote>
[[Image:Branded design and error template.png|400px]]


= Status =
A rectangular network error warning with all text and content is centered vertically and horizontally above a subtle, branded background.  This background may be randomly selected from a series of several images.


== Strings and String Freeze ==
===404, DNS===
[[Image:Basic structure network error with best suggestion.png|500px]]
<br>The basic structure of a network error page when one best suggestion is available.  The problem is summarized in the header, and available tools are listed in descending order of how "close" a match they are.  A Google search with the user's input is available with a click.  For additional information about the error, including the error code, a link titled "Why am I seeing this page?" (shamelessly stolen from Chrome) directs users to a page with more information.  A ping to mozilla or Google assures that a user who sees this page is connected to the internet.


The strings only patch, bug [http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 484313], missed string freeze.  It's been RESOLVED INVALID, and the patch has been moved to the main bug, [http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482874 482874], per beltzner's request.  If the strings patch is to land for 3.5 it will have to go through the exception process.  Since the strings are a prerequisite for the new network error pages functionality, it is all effectively gated on the strings exception process.
[[Image:Basic structure network error without best suggestion.png|500px]]
<br>If no obvious "best match" is available, none is offered.


The downside is that the network error pages functionality proposed here might not make 3.5.  The upside is that we have a little more time to work on the UI designmconnor in particular thinks the existing UI design could benefit from more work.
===No connection===
[[Image:Not connected.png|500px]]
<br>If the user is not connected to the internet, a separate page is displayedThe tools here may be suggestions.


== Implementation ==
[[Image:Linking to network diagnostics.png|500px]]
<br>If the operating system already has network diagnostic function, such as OSX's Network Diagnostics and Windows' Diagnose Network Connections Wiki, simply linking to that may be all that's necessary.  These already gives suggestions on how to fix the problem, so listing more on the network page is redundant.


Now have a Firefox patch that directly supports 404 error redirection natively (the 404 prototype extension is no longer needed).  This patch also includes a C++ implementation of Levenshtein edit distance, accessible from Sqlite.  The alternative URLs query now uses this function.  Note that the DNS Not Found error is still using dummy data for alternative URLs although it's using the same new error page as 404 errors (with only slight differences in wording).
===Firewall===


= Project steps =
==Mockups==
* '''String Freeze for Beta 4''': Mar 19, 2009
* '''Code Freeze for Beta 4''': April 6, 2009


===Completed===
*Open initial bug for 404 handling<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting keep.svg.png|20px]] '''Completed:''' [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482874 Bug 482874] and [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484313 Bug 484313] (DTD changes).
*Create experimental 404 extension and send it out for comments<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting keep.svg.png|20px]] '''Completed,''' comments were:
** Works well for simulated small errors in URLs
** Hard to say how well it works for real errors in the wild.
** Drawing alternatives from the Places DB looks like a practical tool we can use for suggesting alternatives.
* Discuss possible 404 implementation with bzbarsky and others<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting keep.svg.png|20px]] '''Completed,''' comments were:
** 404 interception unified with the existing error handling architecture is too deep a change to make for 3.1.
** A less intrusive approach similar to the one the experimental 404 extension uses may be possible -- need to investigate further.
===In progress===
* Discuss with Google Link Doctor team<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting wait.svg.png|20px]] '''In progress,''' next: follow up on experimental access to the service.
* Implement Levenshtein Distance algorithm in C++<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting keep.svg.png|20px]] '''Completed'''
** Followup: Plug algorithm into Firefox+Sqlite, providing better performance and accuracy compared to the approach used in the extension.<br><br>
**:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting wait.svg.png|20px]] '''In progress'''
* Proposed a plan for actual implementation<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting wait.svg.png|20px]] '''In progress''' (see below)
===To do===
* Follow up with contact on Link Doctor team about experimental access to the Link Doctor service.<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do'''
* Extend the 404 extension to intercept other error types so we can use it to prototype improved error page designs.<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do'''
* Figure out how to plumb 404 interception into Firefox proper (talk to Johnath).<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do'''
* Investigate implementing a proper edit-distance algorithm in C++ that can be used with Sqlite.<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do'''
* Come up with a plan for a production-quality Firefox 3.5 patch.<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do'''
* (Boriss) design a 404 & dnserror explanation website<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting delete.svg-1.png|20px]] '''To do''' (and decide if it is part of scope)
= Proposed Plan =
==3.5==
For 3.5, we're only adding a Google search box to the dnsnotfound page.
==Trunk/after 3.5==
'''We're targeting two error types:'''
# 404 errors.
# DnsNotFound errors.
   
'''Tools to draw on:'''
# Places alternatives: Places DB + Edit Distance -- can be called automatically.
#* Good for errors on URLs that the user has visited before
#* Might be especially useful for misspelled hostnames.
# Google Link Doctor
#* Assuming partner issues are worked out with Google.
#* Can't be called automatically for privacy reasons.
#* Available with one click (similar to pre-loaded Google search box)
# Other easy to implement tools
#* common transformations (www..example.com --> www.example.com, etc.)
#* pre-loaded search box
#* etc.
=404 redirection=
==Design scope==
* Will use 404-specific error page for 3.1 rather than trying to re-use the generic network error page.  The goal is to give the user better indication of the problem and provide tools for next steps if needed.
* Will not redirect obvious custom server error pages.  To this end, we'd like to use a heuristic beyond simple page size for identifying default 404 pages.  Possibilities:
*# Compare to standard Apache and IIS 404 pages, possibly fuzzy (use edit istance?)
*# Use EndDocumentLoad (or other event) + redirect
*# Implement listener in C++, should be able to access 404 status directly from dcument.
*# <s>Deep docshell changes</s> (Not possible for 3.1}
* Will allow original error page to be available at one click
* Will unify with existing error page architecture in v.next.
==Open questions==
* Which tools will be provided?
* Should indication that the error is "404" be provided in the first screen?
* Is it possible to link to a page with more information about the problem?
* How many alternatives should be shown, and how closely should those match user input?
* What distinction should be drawn from the user's perspective between this and a DnsNotFound error?
* Problem: The 404 error page can't be a chrome page, since that could expose us to privilege escalation attacks piggy-backed on XSS attacks.<br><br>
*:[[Image:250px-Pictogram voting keep.svg.png|20px]] '''Solution:''' Use an about: URL to access the 404 error page.
==Resources==
===Sketches===
===Sketches===
<gallery>
Image:Linkdoctor places 404.png|A near match has been found (http://www.americas.com) along with the level above (http://news.bbc.co.uk), either via Places or Google
</gallery>
===Notes===


==Most current design==
[[Image:404 error 2.png]]
* Offers the best suggestion prominently
* Links to the domain
* Searches the domain for the directory
* Offers a Google search box filled with the text entry
* Next step: links to a page with an explanation of the error and more details of what might have gone wrong
=DnsNotFound=
==Design scope==
* Will use the DnsNotFound error page to give the user better indication of the problem and provide tools for next steps if needed
* Will provide the user tools via one-click access to Google Link Doctor
* Will provide the user with better link options with data drawn from Places
==Open questions==
* Which tools will be provided?
* Should indication that the error is "DnsNotFound" be provided in the first screen?
* Is it possible to link to a page with more information about the problem?
* How many alternatives should be shown, and how closely should those match user input?
* What distinction should be drawn from the user's perspective between this and a 404 error?
==Resources==
===Sketches===
<gallery>
<gallery>
Image:Dns error 1 suggestion.png|A suggestion is found, via Google or Places, and search is provided
Image:Dns error 1 suggestion.png|A suggestion is found, via Google or Places, and search is provided
Image:Dns error 2 suggestions.png|Two suggestions might be given if two are clear strong matches
Image:Dns error 2 suggestions.png|Two suggestions might be given if two are clear strong matches
Image:New spacing dns.png|Respaced previous DNS error page.  This design was made with a few constraints: the middle block of text can't be altered except as a whole piece, and since there's not enough time to make a separate website explaining DNS error, removing it could leave a newer lost - it's kept in this mockup.
Image:Linkdoctor places 404.png|A near match has been found (http://www.americas.com) along with the level above (http://news.bbc.co.uk), either via Places or Google
Image:Dns error 2.png|
Image:Linkdoctor_to_the_rescue.png|Now with Link Doctor!
</small>
</gallery>
</gallery>
===Notes===
==Most current design==
[[Image:Dns error 2.png]]
* Unfortunately, there don't seem to be many useful tools we can provide here, beyond a suggestion and a search. 
* It's been noted that having only one suggestion on this page as a bulleted item is visually jarring.  Earlier mockups had this - my logic was that using this standard format means there's consistency between this and the 404 page above it, which could be brought to the other warnings.  Also, this simple bullet list of "tools" can be easily expanded as new link tools may be added.  However, I moved it back in this version and lined up the search box.  Basically I thought that with only four elements it was too much to vary the indentation and spacing of them all.  So if there were more than one "suggestion" it would go back to the 404 format above, but here there's only one (searching Google), so all is left aligned.
* Next step: links to a page with an explanation of the error and more details of what might have gone wrong
[[Image:New spacing dns.png]]
This is a design taking into account some recent decisions based on what could be done for the code freeze vs trunk:
* The middle block of text can't be altered except as a whole piece, and since there's not enough time to make a separate website explaining DNS error, removing it could leave a newer lost - it's kept in this mockup
* Google search can be added - it's given as a prominent option and the most visually distinctive of the options
* Try again is still present.  I experimented making it a button much like it is now and like "Search" is after Google search, but that didn't really work into the style of a bullet list well
<hr>
<hr>
<hr>


=References=
=References=
*Bugs:
*Bugs:
**[http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479922 Bug 479922] -  Network error pages should give me tools instead of asking me questions
**{{bug|479922}} -  Network error pages should give me tools instead of asking me questions
*Mozilla-Central:
*Mozilla-Central:
**[[http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp#3031 nsDocShell::DisplayLoadError] -- dispatches various error pages
**{{source|docshell/base/nsDocShell.cpp#3031|nsDocShell::DisplayLoadError}} -- dispatches various error pages
**[http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/docshell/resources/content/netError.xhtml netError.xhtml]
**{{source|docshell/resources/content/netError.xhtml|netError.xhtml}}
**[http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/certerror/aboutCertError.js aboutCertError.js]
**{{source|browser/components/certerror/aboutCertError.js|aboutCertError.js}} ''(removed)''
*About pages:
*About pages:
**''about:neterror''
**''about:neterror''
Line 298: Line 192:
**[http://127.0.0.1:81 triggers connectionFailure error page]
**[http://127.0.0.1:81 triggers connectionFailure error page]
* [[Firefox3.1/Sprints/Network Error Pages/Error types|List of possible error to address]] (old)
* [[Firefox3.1/Sprints/Network Error Pages/Error types|List of possible error to address]] (old)
* [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox:1.5_Network_Error_Messages Summary of error types (FF 1.5)]
* [[Firefox:1.5_Network_Error_Messages|Summary of error types (FF 1.5)]]
* Johnathan Zittrain - [http://www.herdict.org/web/ HerdictWeb] talk in building K - had ideas about integrating it into Firefox's error pages.  Instead of Firefox just telling you the site is unreachable, maybe it could tell you whether it has been gone for minutes or months, and whether it is broken for everyone or only for certain ISPs or countries.
* Johnathan Zittrain - [http://www.herdict.org/web/ HerdictWeb] talk in building K - had ideas about integrating it into Firefox's error pages.  Instead of Firefox just telling you the site is unreachable, maybe it could tell you whether it has been gone for minutes or months, and whether it is broken for everyone or only for certain ISPs or countries.
* [http://jboriss.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/improving-everyones-favorite-feature-404/ Boriss' 1st blog post]
* [http://jboriss.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/improving-everyones-favorite-feature-404/ Boriss' 1st blog post]
* [[Firefox/Projects/Network_Error_Pages/Test_Plan|Test Plan]]
* Images:
* Images:
<gallery>
<gallery>
Line 306: Line 201:
[image:xxxxxxxxxxx Screenshot of a connectionFailure error page]
[image:xxxxxxxxxxx Screenshot of a connectionFailure error page]
</gallery>
</gallery>
 
= Notes =
Can we use Places autocomplete for link correction?  A mis-typed link will often be in error in only the last couple of characters -- we can truncate the last 2 or 3 characters and rely on Places auto-complete to give us recommendations...
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/places/tests/autocomplete/
A related alternative would be to construct an edit-distance function and register it with SqlLite.  We can then do a query on minimal edit distance (async of course) to get the best link correction matches.
Problem is, how do we hook link correction into the error page?  We'd like to provide suggestions inside the web page similar to Google's "did you mean" on the search results page.
''Google Chrome LinkDoctor Service (linkhelp.clients.google.com)''
  wget -U "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13" "http://linkhelp.clients.google.com/tbproxy/lh/fixurl?sourceid=navclient%20&hl=en&sd=com&error=http404&url=http://news.speeple.com/sunflowers"
 
  wget -U "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.27 Safari/525.13" "http://www.google.com"

Latest revision as of 05:16, 31 March 2011

Summary

When a requested web page cannot be loaded, Firefox should display an error page that not only describes the problem, but which also presents the user with tools to resolve the issue. It also makes sense to extend this functionality to webserver 404 (File not found) responses as well.

Implementation is being tracked in bug 482874

Introduction

When Firefox cannot display a requested web page because of a network error, it currently shows a network error page. This page describes the problem and gives advice on how to fix it, but it currently offers only one "tool" for resolving the problem: the "Try Again" button. This is of limited utility, and for a large class of errors, this is guaranteed not to work (eg. misspelled URLs). A better network error page would provide the user with useful tools towards guiding them to the content they wanted.

Additionally, web pages that result in 404 errors have a lot in common with network error pages, except that the error page is provided by the server. In many cases this is a default 404 error page for the server which is not very helpful. The other major browsers will substitute a browser-provided 404 error page in many cases (the typical rule seems to be not to override server-provided error pages over about 500 bytes in length, since those are likely to be customized). Firefox should provide similar functionality.

Team

cbartley  developer, sprint lead
boriss    UI
johnath   technical advisor
beltzner  Google Link Doctor liaison
ashughes  QA contact

Target Release

Firefox.next (Firefox 3.6?)

Competitive Analysis

All of the current browsers present network error pages for DNS errors. All of the major browsers offer information about why the error message is being presented linked from the error itself. Chrome and Safari offer a Google searchbox for the address bar input.

Chrome is the only browser to currently offer useful tools in a 404 page. It uses Google link doctor to find possible matches both for subdirectories and domains.

Internet Explorer and Chrome offer branded 404 pages, while Safari, Opera, and Firefox 3.5 display the default Apache warnings.

For inputs that do not connect to webpages, Internet Explorer sometimes directs the user to search - previously Microsoft Live Search, now "Bing."

Chart of network error pages in different browsers

Experimental Builds

Try Server Build

https://build.mozilla.org/tryserver-builds/jdolske@mozilla.com-try-442e0af518fd/

I finally have a Try Server build with 404 redirection and a new 404 error page. Alas, this new 404 page looks pretty similar to the old network error page (no fancy LinkDoctor stuff or anything). It does have the new background image, which I still think is cool.

Note that I've only tested the Mac build.

It has a 512 byte 404-redirect threshold similar to Chrome and IE. I've been using http://www.almostinfinite.com/foobar (overrides) and http://www.seattlepi.com/foobar (shows the site 404 page) as test URLs.

404 Extension

A Firefox Extension which overrides 404 pages and supplies information from Google Link Doctor can be found here. Note that the 404-override mechanism is currently pretty crude, and it just has a test UI for displaying all the data returned by Link Doctor. I've only tested it on Firefox 3.5, but it should probably work on Firefox 3.0 as well. It's safe to install it on your default profile, but you may not want to leave it installed.

Status

  • A Places-based suggestions feature and 404 redirection were tested using an extension. It seemed to work well for cases where it made sense at all.
  • Initial page design for DNS Not Found and 404 errors with Places-based suggestions, Search, and Try Again.
  • Entity definitions for the initial page design have been added to "netError.dtd".
  • Now have a C++ implementation of the Levenshtein edit distance algorithm (finding nearest string matches), which is accessible in Places Sqlite queries.
  • 404 errors are intercepted and redirected to the new error page, but only the Places-based suggestions feature is functional.
  • DNS Not Found errors use the new page design, but it’s not functional at all yet.
  • Discussions with the Google Link Doctor team are ongoing.

Near Term Goals

Address just DNS Not Found errors and 404 Errors.

  • Settle on a page design (mostly shared) for DNS Not Found errors and 404 Errors.
  • Get the implementation in good working order.
    • Clean up the 404 interceptor/redirector code and find an appropriate location for it in the source tree.
    • Get Places-based suggestions working for DNS Not Found errors.
    • Add a real search box, using the user’s preferred search engine (but not Wikipedia?).
  • Solicit feedback on functionality, implementation, and page design.
  • Identify an implementation that we can land on trunk in the near term.

Longer Term Goals

  • Add more tools to the new error page design.
    • Google Link Doctor
    • Herdict
    • Other tools TBD
  • Move the other error pages to the new design and unify the implementation.

Possible Tools

  • Retry button
  • Suggested alternatives drawn from Places DB
  • Suggested alternatives drawn from the Google Link Doctor service
  • Suggested alternatives using simple rules of thumb (e.g. “ww.example.com” ? www.example.com)
  • Search box, pre-populated with the failed URL or even anchor text, if available
  • Herdict-based feedback (Herdict provides crowd-source site accessibility data)
  • Other tools, for example the ErrorZilla extension provides Google Cache, Coral Cache, Wayback Machine, Ping, Trace, and Whois.

Caveats, Restrictions, Outstanding Questions

  • Wholesale override of 404 pages would be unpopular, and there is no reliable way to tell the difference between a 404 error page provided by a default install of the web server and a custom 404 error page. The other major browsers seem to look at file size and if it's below a certain threshold, assume that it's a default page and overridable. Additionally a Firefox override might be useful even for custom error pages in some circumstances.
  • The old error page, by design, runs without chrome privileges, and the new page must also be chromeless. This is to prevent an XSS attack from escalating into a privilege escalation attack.
  • There are privacy issues around using Google Link Doctor that will need to be addressed if we are to use it automatically.
  • The current 404 error page interception/redirection code just does a document.location.replace on EndDocumentLoad to redirect to the Firefox 404 error page. This has some limitations, and it may be necessary support this functionality at deeper level in the docshell. This should be possible in the Firefox.next timeframe.
  • One click access to the original server-supplied 404 error page might be desirable.

Design

Quick-Iteration, No Linkdoctor version: Smallpox 0.1

For the first "designed" version of 404 pages, Google Linkdoctor won't be used and a page with additional information won't be available. The tools at our disposal are simply the Places data, which can rank results by how well they match the input. No matter what matches are found, the domain-level link will be offered.

These designs will be used with the 404 extension here, and Firefox custom build here.

Two good Places matches

 

One good Places match

 

No good Places matches

 

Background image placeholder

Future sketches

  Some tools are fetched via places data, others with Google Linkdoctor, in descending order of the strength of the match. Troubleshooting and extra information is linked to, but not displayed.

Design Decisions

  • A Branded Firefox 404 page should override default Apache error warnings.
    • We believe that overriding default 404 error pages is in the best interest of the user. While these pages can occasionally be useful to some users for testing, for most users they provide very little; an explanation that only makes sense to technical users, the name of the server, and no tools. If this page could be substituted for a page that gives intelligent suggestions and a better explanation, it would be useful both to experienced users and new users.
    • Currently, IE and Chrome override 404 pages, while Safari, Opera, and Firefox do not. While there's no way (?) to automatically check if a 404 page is the default Apache one, IE and Chrome place a limit of bytes and direct to their branded 404 pages if the result is less than that.
  • More information about the error and suggestions should be provided to users, but on a link off of the network error page rather than written on it directly.
    • Even beginning users do not need to see this information every time there is a network warning. They may want to read this information the first few times, or refer back to it later, but it's unlikely to be very helpful most times the user accesses this page.
    • Expert users will need this information rarely or never at all, while tools have a better chance of being useful
    • Removing suggestions and information from the error warning makes it easier for the user to see and access tools, which are more useful more often
    • This follows previous conventions; on all major operating systems, error warnings provide a link to more information.
  • The error code (404, DNS Not Found, etc) does not need to be displayed on the main error page.
    • The goal in the main text should be to explain as clearly and simply as possible to the user what is wrong. While both error codes and text would explain the problem to experienced users, error codes do not explain the problem to beginning users.
    • The main reason for including error codes is diagnosis. For instance, if an experienced user needs to know which particular error he is looking at, or if a beginning user is trying to get help from an experienced user, these codes would be important. However, considering adding the code to the main page provides little benefit in most cases and the same benefit can be had putting the error code on a separate page, including it with the extra information and recommendations could be a better way to preserve this information.
  • The network error pages should display the most useful* tools possible for the given input, but no more than five tools.
    • *Most useful will be determined an inexact science of approximation of a "best match," given the tools we have available. For instance, if a page is only one letter off from the user's input, it would have a higher "usefulness" score than simply linking a failed subdirectory to the domain-level page
    • Non-current (cached, stored, etc) pages will be displayed last

Basic Structure

 

A rectangular network error warning with all text and content is centered vertically and horizontally above a subtle, branded background. This background may be randomly selected from a series of several images.

404, DNS

 
The basic structure of a network error page when one best suggestion is available. The problem is summarized in the header, and available tools are listed in descending order of how "close" a match they are. A Google search with the user's input is available with a click. For additional information about the error, including the error code, a link titled "Why am I seeing this page?" (shamelessly stolen from Chrome) directs users to a page with more information. A ping to mozilla or Google assures that a user who sees this page is connected to the internet.

 
If no obvious "best match" is available, none is offered.

No connection

 
If the user is not connected to the internet, a separate page is displayed. The tools here may be suggestions.

 
If the operating system already has network diagnostic function, such as OSX's Network Diagnostics and Windows' Diagnose Network Connections Wiki, simply linking to that may be all that's necessary. These already gives suggestions on how to fix the problem, so listing more on the network page is redundant.

Firewall

Mockups

Sketches

References