Talk:Firefox2/StatusMeetings/2006-02-28: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would http://aspell.sourceforge.net/ be any use for the spellchecking feature? | Would http://aspell.sourceforge.net/ be any use for the spellchecking feature? | ||
[[User:Steve England|Steve England]] 16:41, 28 Feb 2006 (PST) | |||
* as I understand things, we already have the code ready to go, it's just a matter of being able to package and distribute the GPL licensed dictionaries. [[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]] 23:34, 28 Feb 2006 (PST) | |||
---- | |||
(sorry in advance if this has already been said...) For UndoCloseTab, it seems that Dorando's [http://mozilla.dorando.at/readme.html undoclosetab.xpi] approach is worth replicating because it works very well. It simply leverages the history mechanism (if I am reading the code correctly), so that implies to me that leveraging bfcache would be even better. | |||
[[User:ChrisDolan|ChrisDolan]] 17:56, 28 Feb 2006 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:34, 1 March 2006
Would http://aspell.sourceforge.net/ be any use for the spellchecking feature? Steve England 16:41, 28 Feb 2006 (PST)
- as I understand things, we already have the code ready to go, it's just a matter of being able to package and distribute the GPL licensed dictionaries. Beltzner 23:34, 28 Feb 2006 (PST)
(sorry in advance if this has already been said...) For UndoCloseTab, it seems that Dorando's undoclosetab.xpi approach is worth replicating because it works very well. It simply leverages the history mechanism (if I am reading the code correctly), so that implies to me that leveraging bfcache would be even better. ChrisDolan 17:56, 28 Feb 2006 (PST)