|
|
| (54 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| __NOTOC__
| | #REDIRECT [[Add-ons/Reviewers]] |
| | |
| = Introduction =
| |
| AMO leverages volunteer reviewers/editors to look over pending and nominated add-ons for publication on the site. With the launch of [[Update:Remora|Remora]] and the sandbox, aspects of this role have changed significantly.
| |
| | |
| == What's a reviewer? ==
| |
| In version 2 of addons.mozilla.org, the term "reviewer" referred to a person that had access to an approval queue of extensions and themes that were submitted. Reviewers would install the add-on and test it to ensure that it worked properly, and would then either approve the version or deny it.
| |
| | |
| In Remora (version 3), anyone is considered a reviewer. Users can install add-ons as soon as the author submits them. We hope that these users will then return to write a review of their experience with the add-on, whether it be good or bad.
| |
| | |
| == What's an editor? ==
| |
| Editors have access to the queue of pending and nominated add-ons, and their main role is to assess the existing reviews and determine whether the add-on should be pushed to the public side based on criteria in the [http://addons.mozilla.org/pages/policy policy].
| |
| | |
| === Resources ===
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/Applying|How to become an editor]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/ReviewingGuide|Processing the add-on and review queues]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/Testing|Testing add-ons]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/Tools|Tools for Editors]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/FAQ|Editors FAQ]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/Featured_and_Recommended|Recommended, Category Recommended & Trusted Add-ons]]
| |
| * [[AMO:Editors/MeetingNotes|Editor Meeting Notes]]
| |
| * [http://addons.mozilla.org/pages/policy Add-on Policy] (on AMO)
| |
| * [http://addons.mozilla.org/pages/sandbox Sandbox Information] (on AMO)
| |