FirefoxSummit/2006/ProposedSessions/CommunityTestingAndLitmus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Zachlipton (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
== Session Notes == | |||
See [[FirefoxSummit/2006/ProposedSessions/CommunityTestingAndLitmus/Notes]] | |||
== Session Title == | == Session Title == | ||
| Line 36: | Line 39: | ||
* [[User:Asa|Asa Dotzler]] | * [[User:Asa|Asa Dotzler]] | ||
* Tracy Walker | * Tracy Walker | ||
* [[User:Jay|Jay Patel]] | |||
* Alfred Peng | |||
* Peter van der Woude | |||
* Steve England | |||
* Steven Michaud | |||
* Adam Guthrie | |||
* Juan Becerra | |||
* Marcia | |||
Latest revision as of 23:44, 16 November 2006
Session Notes
See FirefoxSummit/2006/ProposedSessions/CommunityTestingAndLitmus/Notes
Session Title
Community Testing and Litmus: What's Working, What Isn't
Session Leaders
- Coop
- Zach
Summary
Litmus has been Mozilla's face to the testing community for over a year now. Over that time, we have learned a lot about the amount and kind of community testing support we can expect. It's time we revisited our assumptions and update the tool to meet our changing needs.
Agenda
- Some stats about testday participation
- Discussion of trends: is more better?
- How has manual test run execution changed over the past year, specifically WRT increased community interaction?
- How can Litmus change to adapt to this?
- Whiteboarding
- test run interface
- new index page -> what aggregate stats do we want?
- new reports?
Interested Attendees
Please add your name here if you're likely to attend this session, this will help prioritize sessions and minimize conflicts
- Coop
- Zach Lipton
- alice nodelman
- Rob Campbell
- Axel Hecht
- Tim Riley
- Asa Dotzler
- Tracy Walker
- Jay Patel
- Alfred Peng
- Peter van der Woude
- Steve England
- Steven Michaud
- Adam Guthrie
- Juan Becerra
- Marcia