Jetpack/Weekly Meeting/2014-09-23: Difference between revisions

Jetpack/Weekly Meeting/2014-09-23 (view source)

697 bytes added , 23 September 2014

Confirmed users

179

edits

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 ** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=893276 Bug 893276] caused a regression and was reverted from 33 (Fx beta) upwards, it is still in Fx 31 & Fx32 however.
 ** What is the best way to provide some add-on scaffolding using jpm?
-** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070952 Context menu 2.0]
+** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070952 Context menu 2.0] Irakli thinks it should be on a roadmap and other devs agree. There are ton of issues with current API which is just too complex, adding devtools support would be nightmare, etc..
-** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070927 make require first class citizen]
+** [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070927 make require first class citizen] - There are bunch of use cases for this like frame scripts in e10s and native jetpacks and there are bunch of bugs that have being filled. It should be pretty easy to do.
-** Tree is red orange
+** Tree is red orange - Erik is working on fixes. Regression was caused by changes of let semantics that have landed as a part of ES6.
-** Bug triage
+** Bug triage - Mossop used to balance the workload and assign bugs to people. Now Irakli had to try to do it blindly (well based of who worked on whato t in a past). This is not ideal and needs to be discussed with Joe to find a better solution.
 = Bugs =