B2G/QA/Automation/UI/Strategy: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< B2G‎ | QA‎ | Automation‎ | UI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
* [[/Integration vs Acceptance|Separate automation concerns for Integration and Acceptance tests]]
* [[/Integration vs Acceptance|Separate automation concerns for Integration and Acceptance tests]]


For Gaia Acceptance:
For Acceptance:


* [[/Streamline Acceptance Execution|Streamline execution for increased responsiveness with less effort]]
* [[/Streamline Acceptance Execution|Streamline execution for increased responsiveness with less effort]]
Line 31: Line 31:
* [[/Increase UAT coverage|Increase coverage using Gaia Acceptance]]
* [[/Increase UAT coverage|Increase coverage using Gaia Acceptance]]


For Gaia Integration:
For Integration:


* [[/Assist with CI tests|Assist the functional teams by increasing coverage]]
* [[/Assist with CI tests|Assist the functional teams by increasing Gaia Integration coverage]]
* [[/Port Gaia Integration Python|Move existing Python tests to JS for wider ownership]]
* [[/Port Gaia Integration Python|Port Gaia Integration Python tests to JavaScript for wider ownership]]


For Community:
For Community:


* [[/Increase Community|Find and implement new approaches to increasing community involvement]] (plan TBD)
* [[/Increase Community|Find and implement new approaches to increasing community involvement]] (plan TBD)

Revision as of 00:30, 13 February 2015

Team Mandates

  • Establish visible subject matter expertise in automation
  • Own, expand and maintain QA acceptance test automation
  • Increase confidence in acceptance test automation
  • Provide expert assistance to improve all phases of UI test coverage
  • Catch problems quickly and effectively
  • Increase community support for FxOS QA
  • Increase quality of and confidence in the product

Challenges

  • Automation systems and concerns are poorly documented
  • Development and QA have different approaches and needs from UI testing
  • UI tests have had no developer support, largely because of Python implementation
  • Team has been blocked too much by cross-team dependencies
  • Test results are hidden in Jenkins
  • Test results have too many spurious failures to sheriff
  • Test results only looked at a limited number of times per day
  • Community paths poorly defined and advertised

Plan

For Acceptance:

For Integration:

For Community: