Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-09-29: Difference between revisions
< Electrolysis | Meetings
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→chutten: filling in) |
(→mconley: Add mconley stuff.) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== mconley == | == mconley == | ||
* TBD | * {{bug|1300411}} - user reports excessive load spinning when switching tabs with e10s in 48.0.2 release | ||
** Posted a number of GC logs from a user that I'm in touch with over e-mail. [https://bug1300411.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8795395 In at least one], the user was OOM'ing. | |||
** [http://analysis.telemetry.mozilla.org/ Learning how to use analysis.telemetry.mozilla.org] | |||
*** Took a snapshot of pings sent in on September 23rd, and filtered down to clients that should have e10s enabled by default | |||
*** Of these clients, a little over a quarter of them have seen at least one spinner of any length. We'll call these the "spinning clients" | |||
*** Of the spinning clients: | |||
**** ~82% of them saw a spinner of 2s or less ("low" bucket) | |||
**** ~16% of them saw a spinner between 2s and 5s ("mid" bucket) | |||
**** ~16% of them saw a spinner greater than 5s in length ("high" bucket) | |||
*** Note that there is, of course, overlap between the clients in those buckets | |||
**** ~2% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "mid" and "high" buckets | |||
**** ~6% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "low" and "high" buckets | |||
**** ~7% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "low" and "mid" buckets. | |||
** I think the only way we're going to grind these numbers down is by knowing exactly what the content process is doing so we can prioritize | |||
** Getting ramped up on {{bug|1303077}} | |||
* {{bug|1241459}} - [e10s] A crashed background tab does not give option to submit | |||
** TBD | |||
== chutten == | == chutten == |
Revision as of 16:00, 29 September 2016
« previous week | index | next week »
mconley
- bug 1300411 - user reports excessive load spinning when switching tabs with e10s in 48.0.2 release
- Posted a number of GC logs from a user that I'm in touch with over e-mail. In at least one, the user was OOM'ing.
- Learning how to use analysis.telemetry.mozilla.org
- Took a snapshot of pings sent in on September 23rd, and filtered down to clients that should have e10s enabled by default
- Of these clients, a little over a quarter of them have seen at least one spinner of any length. We'll call these the "spinning clients"
- Of the spinning clients:
- ~82% of them saw a spinner of 2s or less ("low" bucket)
- ~16% of them saw a spinner between 2s and 5s ("mid" bucket)
- ~16% of them saw a spinner greater than 5s in length ("high" bucket)
- Note that there is, of course, overlap between the clients in those buckets
- ~2% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "mid" and "high" buckets
- ~6% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "low" and "high" buckets
- ~7% of the spinning clients saw spinners in both the "low" and "mid" buckets.
- I think the only way we're going to grind these numbers down is by knowing exactly what the content process is doing so we can prioritize
- Getting ramped up on bug 1303077
- bug 1241459 - [e10s] A crashed background tab does not give option to submit
- TBD
chutten
Helped out :mconley with some analysis stuff. We have a fairly good understanding of how many people are effected, but not how badly those people are effected. For instance: we know how many people are seeing spinners of various lengths... but how frequently are they seeing them?