QA/improve permission prompt UI: Difference between revisions

QA/improve permission prompt UI (view source)

Revision as of 14:37, 12 January 2017

446 bytes added , 12 January 2017

→‎Risk Assessment and Coverage

Brindusa.tot

533

edits

@@ Line 145: / Line 145: @@
 ! ID !! Description / Threat Description !! Covered by Test Objective !!  Magnitude !! Probability !! Priority !! Impact Score
 |-
-| RAC-1 || Mouse and keyboard actions may not be recognized || TO-1 || 2-Moderate || 1-Unlikely || 3-High || 6
+| RAC-1 || Refactoring of permissions prompt UI might affect Firefox base functionality  || TO-1 || 3-High|| 3-Almost Certain|| 3-High || 6
 |-
-| RAC-2 || Some permission prompt types are not recognized and functional || TO-3 || 3- High|| 2-Possible || 3-High || 18
+| RAC-2 || Basic permission functionality might get broken || TO-3 || 3- High|| 3-Almost Certain|| 3-High || 18
 |-
-| RAC-3 || Possible performance issues with multiple tabs || TO-4 || 2-Moderate || 2-Possible || 3-High || 12
+| RAC-3 || Mouse and keyboard actions may not be recognized || TO-1 || 2-Moderate || 1-Unlikely || 3-High || 6
 |-
-| RAC-4 || After visiting for the first time a tab containing a permission prompt, the permission prompt starts with a delay || TO-1 || 3-High || 3-Almost Certain || 3-High || 27
+| RAC-4 || Possible performance issues with multiple tabs for different permission prompt set || TO-4 || 2-Moderate || 2-Possible || 3-High || 12
 |-
+| RAC-5 || Possible delay for the permission prompt when accessing a site || TO-1 || 3-High || 3-Almost Certain || 3-High || 27
+|-
+| RAC-6 || Backround colors and colors in general are visible and readable under high contrast  || TO-08  || 3-High || 3-Almost Certain|| 2-Medium || 18
+|-
+| RAC-7 || Screen reader on the warning message? || TO-08 || 1- Low || 2-Possible || 3-High || 6
+|-
+| RAC-8 || RTL  || TO-09  || 1- Low || 2-Possible || 2-Medium || 4
 |}
@@ Line 164: / Line 171: @@
 '''Impact Score Breakdown:'''
-* An impact value of 1 or 2 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
+* An impact value of 1, 2, 3, 4 would describe an area which although should be covered there aren't expected any discoveries of critical issues.
-* An impact value of 4, 8 or 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
+* An impact value of 6, 8, 9, 12 would describe an area in which we expect to find issues but those issues are not expected to be critical.
 * An impact value of 18 or 27 would describe an area on which it is likely to find issues and those issues to be critical or blockers.