195
edits
Foundation/2021/OKRs: Difference between revisions
→OKR 2: Modeling Good Data Stewardship: Accelerate more equitable data governance alternatives to advance trustworthy AI.: Added motivation and sample activities
(→OKR 1: Making AI Transparency the Norm: Test AI transparency "best practices" to increase adoption by builders and policymakers.: added motivation & sample activities) |
(→OKR 2: Modeling Good Data Stewardship: Accelerate more equitable data governance alternatives to advance trustworthy AI.: Added motivation and sample activities) |
||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| 2.1 | | 2.1 | ||
| 7 projects tested with real users to identify building blocks for viable data stewardship models. | | 7 projects tested with real users to identify building blocks for viable data stewardship models. | ||
'''Motivation:''' <br /> | |||
We have a number of projects funded or underway to test our alternative data stewardship models. In 2021, we want to: a. Design, implement, test and advance these projects; and b. establish a set of ‘success criteria’ for these projects in the process. | |||
'''Sample Activities:''' | |||
* Develop and document success criteria for Data Futures Lab, Common Voice, MoFo CRM. | |||
* Document Data Futures Lab grantee partners success and failures, and feed this into the development of criteria for replicablicablity. | |||
* Take over stewardship of the Common Voice project, modeling and documenting our thinking on how citizen-built data commons for AI can work. | |||
* Use CRM update project to develop new MoFo data governance processes, Pan Mozilla data sharing framework and ways to model citizen-centric approaches to data stewardship. | |||
| Mehan Jayasuriya | | Mehan Jayasuriya | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2.2 | | 2.2 | ||
| 5 regulatory jurisdictions utilize our input to enable collective data rights for users. | | 5 regulatory jurisdictions utilize our input to enable collective data rights for users. | ||
'''Motivation:''' <br /> | |||
While many jurisdictions are giving people new data rights, there are few places where people can pursue these rights collectively or are protected from collective harm. In 2021, we want to develop -- and advocate for -- concrete policy proposals related to collective data rights. | |||
'''Sample Activities:''' | |||
* Work with Data Futures Lab grantees to use existing regulatory frameworks collectively on behalf of their constituents (eg. labour + consumers). | |||
* Set up a data rights policy working group (team/fellows) to develop a position on -- and advocate for -- collective data rights in regulations in EU, UK, Canada, and India. | |||
* Also, develop recommendations on collective data rights for inclusion in U.S. platform accountability approaches being considered by the new administration. | |||
| Mathias Vermeulen | | Mathias Vermeulen | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2.3 | | 2.3 | ||
| 6 stakeholder groups established as constituents of the Data Futures Lab. | | 6 stakeholder groups established as constituents of the Data Futures Lab. | ||
'''Motivation:''' <br /> | |||
We now have a ‘proto’ Data Futures Lab in place. In 2021, we will fully launch the Lab, creating a kinetic point of connection across many disciplines and geographies. As an increasing number of researchers, policy makers, activists, designers, developers, legal experts and funders ‘join’, momentum, funding, expertise and impact will grow from the Lab. | |||
'''Sample Activities:''' | |||
* Launch Lab, hire staff, establish stakeholder engagement. | |||
* Make Infrastructure Fund grants to stakeholders w high motivation for alternative data governance models. * Source second cohort of Prototype Fund grantee partners. | |||
* Core funders engage other funders who join collaborative. Non-tech funders invest in Lab. | |||
* Convene developers and builders; journalists, researchers, activists. | |||
| Kasia Odrozek | | Kasia Odrozek | ||
|- | |- | ||