Confirmed users
43
edits
L10n Talk:Dictionaries: Difference between revisions
→The obnoxious tri-license requirement: see also bug 487596
(→The obnoxious tri-license requirement: new section) |
(→The obnoxious tri-license requirement: see also bug 487596) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
It is rather ridiculous - I thought that Free Software licenses are supposed to make distributing software easy. If the dictionaries can be easily added from Mozilla's own repository, why can't they be bundled? | It is rather ridiculous - I thought that Free Software licenses are supposed to make distributing software easy. If the dictionaries can be easily added from Mozilla's own repository, why can't they be bundled? | ||
(I can understand this in case of Ubuntu and MP3 codecs, where it's not just the license, but also the patent issue; In that case the codecs are kept in a separate restricted repository.) --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 14:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | (I can understand this in case of Ubuntu and MP3 codecs, where it's not just the license, but also the patent issue; In that case the codecs are kept in a separate restricted repository.) | ||
See also [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487596 bug 487596]. --[[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] 14:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC) | |||