Confirmed users
2,595
edits
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2009-09-08: Difference between revisions
SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings/2009-09-08 (view source)
Revision as of 12:40, 8 September 2009
, 8 September 2009→SeaMonkey 2.0 Final
Philip Chee (talk | contribs) |
Philip Chee (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* We need triaging of blocker and wanted requests, can IanN do that? | * We need triaging of blocker and wanted requests, can IanN do that? | ||
** We can probably put off a number of things, where they sound useful, to 2.1a1 or 2.1. | ** We can probably put off a number of things, where they sound useful, to 2.1a1 or 2.1. | ||
** The theme regressions are all just about sorted. | |||
* Target schedule: Freeze October 6, ship mid-October? | * Target schedule: Freeze October 6, ship mid-October? | ||
** Thunderbird is expecting RC1 freeze on 3rd November but string freeze also on October 6 or so. | ** Thunderbird is expecting RC1 freeze on 3rd November but string freeze also on October 6 or so. | ||
** Freeze on October 6th should allow at least a week of string freeze for final and allow us for some time of candidate testing, whether we push them as public RC releases or not. | ** Freeze on October 6th should allow at least a week of string freeze for final and allow us for some time of candidate testing, whether we push them as public RC releases or not. | ||
** We should set up plans for string and code freezes, ideally with string freeze on Thursday 1st before code freeze on Tuesday 6th., and targeting to spin an RC1 on Wednesday after code freeze. | |||
=== Feature List, Planning === | === Feature List, Planning === | ||