Firefox 3.6/Personas Uplift Security Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '== Overview == ''Describe the goals and objectives of the feature here.'' ;Background links * feature-tracking bug links * specs or design docs == Security and Privacy == * Is …') |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
;Background links | ;Background links | ||
* feature-tracking bug links | * feature-tracking bug links | ||
** {{bug|511104}} | |||
* specs or design docs | * specs or design docs | ||
** https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Personas_Uplift_Exploration | |||
== Security and Privacy == | == Security and Privacy == | ||
* Is this feature a security feature? If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve? | * Is this feature a security feature? If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve? | ||
** no | |||
* What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed? | * What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed? | ||
* Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing? | * Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing? | ||
* Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project. | * Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project. | ||
* How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled? | * How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled? | ||
** not at all | |||
== Exported APIs == | == Exported APIs == | ||
Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
* Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully? | * Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully? | ||
* Does it change any existing interfaces? | * Does it change any existing interfaces? | ||
** no | |||
== Module interactions == | == Module interactions == | ||
Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
== Data == | == Data == | ||
* What data is read or parsed by this feature? | * What data is read or parsed by this feature? | ||
** the data-browsertheme attribute is read from content and parsed using JSON.parse | |||
* What is the output of this feature? | * What is the output of this feature? | ||
* What storage formats are used? | * What storage formats are used? | ||
** prefs and profile-folder/lightweighttheme-header, profile-folder/lightweighttheme-footer | |||
== Reliability == | == Reliability == | ||
* What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user? | * What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user? | ||
** When the InstallBrowserTheme event is dispatched on a content node, a notification bar appears, saying that this site (the location.host of the node's ownerDocument) attempted to install a theme. There's an "Allow" button. Not approved for 1.9.2 yet: When a theme has been installed, another notifcation bar confirms that a theme has been installed, allowing the user to undo this or open the add-ons manager's themes pane. | |||
* Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes? | * Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes? | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 19 October 2009
Overview
Describe the goals and objectives of the feature here.
- Background links
- feature-tracking bug links
- specs or design docs
Security and Privacy
- Is this feature a security feature? If it is, what security issues is it intended to resolve?
- no
- What potential security issues in your feature have you already considered and addressed?
- Is system or subsystem security compromised in any way if your project's configuration files / prefs are corrupt or missing?
- Include a thorough description of the security assumptions, capabilities and any potential risks (possible attack points) being introduced by your project.
- How are transitions in/out of Private Browsing mode handled?
- not at all
Exported APIs
- Please provide a table of exported interfaces (APIs, ABIs, protocols, UI, etc.)
- Does it interoperate with a web service? How will it do so?
- Explain the significant file formats, names, syntax, and semantics.
- Are the externally visible interfaces documented clearly enough for a non-Mozilla developer to use them successfully?
- Does it change any existing interfaces?
- no
Module interactions
- What other modules are used (REQUIRES in the makefile, interfaces)?
Data
- What data is read or parsed by this feature?
- the data-browsertheme attribute is read from content and parsed using JSON.parse
- What is the output of this feature?
- What storage formats are used?
- prefs and profile-folder/lightweighttheme-header, profile-folder/lightweighttheme-footer
Reliability
- What failure modes or decision points are presented to the user?
- When the InstallBrowserTheme event is dispatched on a content node, a notification bar appears, saying that this site (the location.host of the node's ownerDocument) attempted to install a theme. There's an "Allow" button. Not approved for 1.9.2 yet: When a theme has been installed, another notifcation bar confirms that a theme has been installed, allowing the user to undo this or open the add-ons manager's themes pane.
- Can its files be corrupted by failures? Does it clean up any locks/files after crashes?
Configuration
- Can the end user configure settings, via a UI or about:config? Hidden prefs? Environment variables?
- Are there build options for developers? [#ifdefs, ac_add_options, etc.]
- What ranges for the tunable are appropriate? How are they determined?
- What are its on-going maintenance requirements (e.g. Web links, perishable data files)?
Relationships to other projects
Are there related projects in the community?
- If so, what is the proposal's relationship to their work? Do you depend on others' work, or vice-versa?
- Are you updating, copying or changing functional areas maintained by other groups? How are you coordinating and communicating with them? Do they "approve" of what you propose?