Confirmed users
161
edits
User:Asqueella/JEP 107: Difference between revisions
→Discussion - e10s: link to the latest myk's post
(mark parts of the JEP that are likely to change (model "B"/"C")) |
(→Discussion - e10s: link to the latest myk's post) |
||
| Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
** [Nickolay] suggested this as an optional addition to (B) for scripts that need transparent interaction with content. | ** [Nickolay] suggested this as an optional addition to (B) for scripts that need transparent interaction with content. | ||
** [Benjamin] That's attractive in some ways, but it breaks the normal jetpack behavior of being a single script that does everything. I'm not sure it's worth breaking that programming model. | ** [Benjamin] That's attractive in some ways, but it breaks the normal jetpack behavior of being a single script that does everything. I'm not sure it's worth breaking that programming model. | ||
** [http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla-labs-jetpack/msg/6c0eb6901d51742a [Myk]] given the technical limitations inherent to [jetpacks and content in separate processes], the question then becomes what feasible model best approximates [the] ideal experience. I think the answer to that question is in fact your suggested model C. | |||
** '''Requires additional code in the single-process case, additions to the platform in the e10s case.''' | ** '''Requires additional code in the single-process case, additions to the platform in the e10s case.''' | ||