Websites/Taskforce/Proposals/Web Fonts

Web Fonts Proposal (Status: Draft)

Working Group

Ned Schwartz and David Boswell

Problem

Mozilla branding uses the FontFont Meta font for logotype. However, FF Meta is a proprietary font with a closed license.

It is felt that it would serve Mozilla's goals best to search for a free and open alternative to FF Meta.

A free and open font becomes especially important when it comes to extending the Mozilla brand to it's web properties through the use of css3 @font-face embedding. FF Meta cannot be included in a Mozilla project without compromising Mozilla's goal of distributing only open-licensed code (where is this goal stated? -ned).

This brings up a few questions:

1. Should Meta be replaced completely in Mozilla branding, or are we just concerned about web typography?
2. Do we want and/or need to have consistant typography across mozilla products and websites?
3. How open do we need the licensing of our replacement font to be? Is it simply being free as in beer good enough to allows code to be distributed? Or do we want a license that allows modification etc.

Solution

One solution is to find a font or set of fonts that Mozilla adopts and recommends for use in websites. Already there are a few fonts that have been adopted in the Mozilla web universe:

Museo Sans

• Mozilla Labs
• Bespin

Titillium

http://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/TitilliumText

• Get Firebug