83
edits
Update:Archive/2.0/Developers/Review Process: Difference between revisions
Update:Archive/2.0/Developers/Review Process (view source)
Revision as of 19:20, 3 February 2005
, 3 February 2005no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Update:Home_Page|Update: Home Page]] » Review Process | |||
== Developers == | |||
Owner:<br> | Owner:<br> | ||
Scott Kveton kveton AT osuosl org | Scott Kveton kveton AT osuosl org | ||
| Line 9: | Line 13: | ||
This is not meant to be a final or immutable list. This is a small core, but we will expand as and when it is appropriate. Please note that technical prowess alone is not sufficient here. Sound judgement and communication skills are equally important in the project management process. If someone demonstrates the appropriate set of qualifications, they will be asked to join. | This is not meant to be a final or immutable list. This is a small core, but we will expand as and when it is appropriate. Please note that technical prowess alone is not sufficient here. Sound judgement and communication skills are equally important in the project management process. If someone demonstrates the appropriate set of qualifications, they will be asked to join. | ||
Code Review | == Code Review == | ||
In order to drive 2.0 development, UMO's featureset will not be expanded, save for certain and specific changes to ensure stability/security in an ongoing manner. To that aim, all checkins to 1.0's branch will require two peer reviews and approval from Scott. This is a high standard, but necessary at this stage. | In order to drive 2.0 development, UMO's featureset will not be expanded, save for certain and specific changes to ensure stability/security in an ongoing manner. To that aim, all checkins to 1.0's branch will require two peer reviews and approval from Scott. This is a high standard, but necessary at this stage. | ||