QA/Fennec/Waverley/Postmortem/Fx5: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
< QA‎ | Fennec‎ | Waverley
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 24: Line 24:
= Planning =
= Planning =
* What went well? What could improve?
* What went well? What could improve?
** Waverley:Desktop
*** Try to avoid 2 releases at the same time
* Are tasks well defined and in the right places when you need them?
* Are tasks well defined and in the right places when you need them?
** Waverley:Desktop
*** Overall yes - wiki pages need more organizing and clean-up
* Are assignments clear?
* Are assignments clear?
** Waverley:Desktop
*** Yes - more pressure on devs to set flags for Firefox 6,7... when they upload patches so as for us not to leak bugs in the bug verification process


= Testing Approach and Mechanics =
= Testing Approach and Mechanics =

Revision as of 13:52, 1 July 2011

Firefox Waverley/QA Postmortem

The purpose of the meeting is to identify any areas where we can improve our QA process for future releases, with Firefox 5 as an example. We'll focus on communication, testing approach and mechanics, and any other feedback you would like to provide.

  1. Who: QA/Waverley Leads
  2. What: What worked, what needs improvement, suggestions for changes that might make us more efficient

Communication

  • What went well? What could improve?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Week's highlights on etherpad are no longer being set
  • Are we communicating frequently enough?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • We could set another meeting to discus specific issues (either by telephone or on the IRC)
  • Was turn-round time for resolving issues or questions adequate?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Try to avoid 2 releases at the same time (ie: Firefox 5 and Firefox 3.6.18)
  • Are the topics we discuss in meetings the right set of things?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • No - more focus on specific issues (what is blocking the work, what are the plans for the next period, what was discussed in other meetings and is of interesting for everybody)
  • Are the media we are using appropriate for the kind of information we share? (wiki, etherpads, irc, ...)
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Yes - wiki pages need more organizing as information is spread all over - not centralized enough.

Planning

  • What went well? What could improve?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Try to avoid 2 releases at the same time
  • Are tasks well defined and in the right places when you need them?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Overall yes - wiki pages need more organizing and clean-up
  • Are assignments clear?
    • Waverley:Desktop
      • Yes - more pressure on devs to set flags for Firefox 6,7... when they upload patches so as for us not to leak bugs in the bug verification process

Testing Approach and Mechanics

  • What went well? What could improve?
  • Are we focusing on the right tasks per channel and milestone?
  • Which tasks have the most impact? Which have lesser impact?
  • What should we focus on for the next releases?

Other Feedback

Take Aways