Firefox/Features/InstallerUIRewrite: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
}}
}}
{{FeaturePageBody
{{FeaturePageBody
|Feature overview=To support Windows x64 we would like to have a stub installer that checks if the user is runnin Windows x64 and then downloads / installs the correct bits. To accomplish this, I propose we use the existing installer, have it check if it already has the files to install, and if it doesn't have it download an archive containing the correct files. To support this, a rewrite of the installer user interface will be necessary.
|Feature overview=To support Windows x64 we would like to have a stub installer that checks if the user is running Windows x64 and then downloads / installs the correct bits. To accomplish this, I propose we use the existing installer, have it check if it already has the files to install, and if it doesn't have it download an archive containing the correct files. To support this, a rewrite of the installer user interface will be necessary.
 
This feature falls primarily in the '''Experience''' category (from the "Discover, Experience, and Connect" vision statement.)
|Feature requirements=* For clarity, the installer user interface rewrite can be done prior to implementing the stub installer.
|Feature requirements=* For clarity, the installer user interface rewrite can be done prior to implementing the stub installer.
|Feature ux design=Initial mockups can be found in {{bug|651965}}.
|Feature ux design=Initial mockups can be found in {{bug|651965}}.

Revision as of 19:51, 29 July 2011

Please use "Edit with form" above to edit this page.

Status

Installer UI Rewrite
Stage On hold
Status `
Release target `
Health OK
Status note On hold - Jay (or Asa?) to follow up with rs

{{#set:Feature name=Installer UI Rewrite

|Feature stage=On hold |Feature status=` |Feature version=` |Feature health=OK |Feature status note=On hold - Jay (or Asa?) to follow up with rs }}

Team

Product manager Asa Dotzler
Directly Responsible Individual Robert Strong
Lead engineer Robert Strong
Security lead `
Privacy lead `
Localization lead `
Accessibility lead `
QA lead `
UX lead Alex Faaborg
Product marketing lead `
Operations lead `
Additional members `

{{#set:Feature product manager=Asa Dotzler

|Feature feature manager=Robert Strong |Feature lead engineer=Robert Strong |Feature security lead=` |Feature privacy lead=` |Feature localization lead=` |Feature accessibility lead=` |Feature qa lead=` |Feature ux lead=Alex Faaborg |Feature product marketing lead=` |Feature operations lead=` |Feature additional members=` }}

Open issues/risks

`

Stage 1: Definition

1. Feature overview

To support Windows x64 we would like to have a stub installer that checks if the user is running Windows x64 and then downloads / installs the correct bits. To accomplish this, I propose we use the existing installer, have it check if it already has the files to install, and if it doesn't have it download an archive containing the correct files. To support this, a rewrite of the installer user interface will be necessary.

This feature falls primarily in the Experience category (from the "Discover, Experience, and Connect" vision statement.)

2. Users & use cases

`

3. Dependencies

`

4. Requirements

  • For clarity, the installer user interface rewrite can be done prior to implementing the stub installer.

Non-goals

`

Stage 2: Design

5. Functional specification

`

6. User experience design

Initial mockups can be found in bug 651965.

Most recent mockup: https://bug651965.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=543348

Note that after the user clicks install on step 1, even if they walk away Firefox will eventually be installed. This will likely improve conversion, since the stub installer is considerably smaller than the entire Firefox download (and they may lose interest at the download stage).

Here's a high level view of our previous install process

Stage 3: Planning

7. Implementation plan

`

8. Reviews

Security review

A security review should not be necessary for the installer user interface rewrite though a security review will most assuredly be required for the stub installer (bug 322206).

Privacy review

`

Localization review

`

Accessibility

`

Quality Assurance review

`

Operations review

`

Stage 4: Development

9. Implementation

These are the bugs we are using the track this work...

Stage 5: Release

10. Landing criteria

` {{#set:Feature open issues and risks=` |Feature overview=To support Windows x64 we would like to have a stub installer that checks if the user is running Windows x64 and then downloads / installs the correct bits. To accomplish this, I propose we use the existing installer, have it check if it already has the files to install, and if it doesn't have it download an archive containing the correct files. To support this, a rewrite of the installer user interface will be necessary.

This feature falls primarily in the Experience category (from the "Discover, Experience, and Connect" vision statement.) |Feature users and use cases=` |Feature dependencies=` |Feature requirements=* For clarity, the installer user interface rewrite can be done prior to implementing the stub installer. |Feature non-goals=` |Feature functional spec=` |Feature ux design=Initial mockups can be found in bug 651965.

Most recent mockup: https://bug651965.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=543348

Note that after the user clicks install on step 1, even if they walk away Firefox will eventually be installed. This will likely improve conversion, since the stub installer is considerably smaller than the entire Firefox download (and they may lose interest at the download stage).

Here's a high level view of our previous install process |Feature implementation plan=` |Feature security review=A security review should not be necessary for the installer user interface rewrite though a security review will most assuredly be required for the stub installer (bug 322206). |Feature privacy review=` |Feature localization review=` |Feature accessibility review=` |Feature qa review=` |Feature operations review=` |Feature implementation notes=These are the bugs we are using the track this work...

|Feature landing criteria=` }}

Feature details

Priority Unprioritized
Rank 999
Theme / Goal `
Roadmap Firefox Desktop
Secondary roadmap `
Feature list Desktop
Project `
Engineering team `

{{#set:Feature priority=Unprioritized

|Feature rank=999 |Feature theme=` |Feature roadmap=Firefox Desktop |Feature secondary roadmap=` |Feature list=Desktop |Feature project=` |Feature engineering team=` }}

Team status notes

  status notes
Products ` `
Engineering ` `
Security ` `
Privacy ` `
Localization ` `
Accessibility ` `
Quality assurance ` `
User experience ` `
Product marketing ` `
Operations ` `

{{#set:Feature products status=`

|Feature products notes=` |Feature engineering status=` |Feature engineering notes=` |Feature security status=` |Feature security health=` |Feature security notes=` |Feature privacy status=` |Feature privacy notes=` |Feature localization status=` |Feature localization notes=` |Feature accessibility status=` |Feature accessibility notes=` |Feature qa status=` |Feature qa notes=` |Feature ux status=` |Feature ux notes=` |Feature product marketing status=` |Feature product marketing notes=` |Feature operations status=` |Feature operations notes=` }}