126
edits
Update:Remora Idea Dump: Difference between revisions
Answered some ideas
Electronical (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(Answered some ideas) |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
: I think that /addon/addon-name/ or even /addon/1234-addon-name/ is better than /addon/1234/ /author/321-john/ or /author/john/ is also better than /auhor/321/ [[User:Tbassetto|Tbassetto]] 01:14, 23 August 2006 (PDT) | : I think that /addon/addon-name/ or even /addon/1234-addon-name/ is better than /addon/1234/ /author/321-john/ or /author/john/ is also better than /auhor/321/ [[User:Tbassetto|Tbassetto]] 01:14, 23 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
:: Sure, but I think we've been through this before and it creates problems if the add-on's name changes... Since it's all done through .htaccess anyway I suppose it could just match both the addon's current name and it's old name/s with the ID, if we added old add-on name info to the db... that's ugly though. | :: Sure, but I think we've been through this before and it creates problems if the add-on's name changes... Since it's all done through .htaccess anyway I suppose it could just match both the addon's current name and it's old name/s with the ID, if we added old add-on name info to the db... that's ugly though. - Cameron | ||
:: Yeah, it's not practical, especially in the presence of names containing non-ASCII characters. [[User:Shaver|Shaver]] 11:30, 30 August 2006 (PDT) | :: Yeah, it's not practical, especially in the presence of names containing non-ASCII characters. [[User:Shaver|Shaver]] 11:30, 30 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
Maybe it's a good idea to include a link to a extension developer faq (or the wiki section) in the denial email message. | Maybe it's a good idea to include a link to a extension developer faq (or the wiki section) in the denial email message. | ||
--[[User:Electronical|Electronical]] 04:44, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | --[[User:Electronical|Electronical]] 04:44, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
: File a regular ol' bug, this doesn't require wide-sweeping changes as planned for Remora, just someone documenting stuff on the wiki and a simple patch for the site. [[User:Cameron|Cameron]] 07:07, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | |||
| Line 105: | Line 106: | ||
In my opinion, AMO is in need of an overhaul. There are so many good extensions out there, but finding them on AMO is difficult - for a number of reasons. A number of individual Bugs have long-been filed suggesting improvements for the site, but until the problem is attacked from a 'big picture' perspective, I don't foresee the site reaching its full potential. I filed [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349430/ Bug 349430] to address the issue, and listed the 3 major problem areas and some considerations that need to be met in order to make AMO a user-friendly site. [[User:RenegadeX|RenegadeX]] 21:16, 25 August 2006 (PDT) | In my opinion, AMO is in need of an overhaul. There are so many good extensions out there, but finding them on AMO is difficult - for a number of reasons. A number of individual Bugs have long-been filed suggesting improvements for the site, but until the problem is attacked from a 'big picture' perspective, I don't foresee the site reaching its full potential. I filed [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349430/ Bug 349430] to address the issue, and listed the 3 major problem areas and some considerations that need to be met in order to make AMO a user-friendly site. [[User:RenegadeX|RenegadeX]] 21:16, 25 August 2006 (PDT) | ||
: As mentioned on that bug, simply stating "it's not good how it is" is not helpful. If you've got any individual behaviours you'd like to suggest or discuss, please feel free to do so. Everyone working on Remora is already aware of the existing bugs. [[User:Cameron|Cameron]] 07:07, 31 August 2006 (PDT) | |||