Mobile/firefoxhome/07-25-2011: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<small>« previous week | index | next week</small> = Dial-in = *650-903-0800 or 65...")
 
Line 35: Line 35:


== Other ==
== Other ==
== nhirata's raw notes ==
Home meeting:
Server side peices:
St3fan:
* API investigation,
* nice start w/ part of the back end that provides search; will be working on trigger search
* addon side, slowly working on that.  A little bit of work on the ui side and then send out
- will work with fabrice on that part
* write up on platform that could be used
* stablility on that and trying to proto type that
* layout and style for search result page... possibly done by tomorrow
- front end coding
* Search stuff in separate app; will merge to main app
* email from dianne from user testing/user research land
* hard to just fix stuff; not everything will be relevant; need triage
* QA asking to be in triage
* UX guys are out (for this meeting)
* UR - PDF on stuff;
- little stuff, need to get out of prototype
- broadly usable for lots of people?
- stuff we have is useful, maybe not in stand alone
- maybe within firefox
- need more thought on current value
- rather than being overwhelmed,
* QA :
- nhirata to be on vacation from thursday to monday; back tuesday
- QA busy with fennec
- wait until search is in and the ipad app that stefan
plus teh add on
- recording the data of web serve that's pushed to server
- addon that which makes pancake require no use of sync
- just log in with browser id, validates the email
- greatly simplifies the login process
- can bring in / watch behavior for profile
- decouples us from sync versionings
- doesn't worry about passwords or addons, etc.
- info stored in server; server side is set up
- currently syncs to sync server then to our server
- our data (mysql database of urls)
- not complicated data structures.  just urls
- no encryption on stored data (urls)
- sent via encryptions
Stuart:
- different views of data
- the ones we want to do automatically
- we can start it from one that starts for you, and then you start building on it and customizing it, your own view, pinview
- the default pancake views
- search is a view;
- currently search is the main thing
- whole web; totally about search
- when addon; search that looks at stuff you're doing
- scratching the surface
- doing more over time
- only one view currently
- UX guys to to take a look at classifying stuff on web
- news paper, what are the different sections of it
- technologies, business, etc.
- does it make sense to divide them like that?
- our own views based on that system
- ~ 10 ?  edit/customizable?
- some more mockups
- recommended versus pinned?
- hybrid (my fav) + recommendations?
- real goal to come up with real things
- present what user wants 90 % of the time
- would like pinnable site
- need to think about more
- not knowing what the default view should be
- core funcationality out first

Revision as of 21:42, 25 July 2011

« previous week | index | next week

Dial-in

  • 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x92 Conf# 265 (US/INTL)
  • 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 265 (US)
  • IRC channel #fxhome
  • Room: MTV 3Z - Zombocom
  • Vidyo: tbd

Agenda

  • AIs from last meeting

  • New ACTION ITEMS

Engineering Update

Crypto / Sync

UX and User Research

Design

Research

QA

Marketing & PR

Feedback Summary

Support

Other

nhirata's raw notes

Home meeting: Server side peices: St3fan:

  • API investigation,
  • nice start w/ part of the back end that provides search; will be working on trigger search
  • addon side, slowly working on that. A little bit of work on the ui side and then send out

- will work with fabrice on that part

  • write up on platform that could be used
  • stablility on that and trying to proto type that
  • layout and style for search result page... possibly done by tomorrow

- front end coding

  • Search stuff in separate app; will merge to main app
  • email from dianne from user testing/user research land
  • hard to just fix stuff; not everything will be relevant; need triage

* QA asking to be in triage

  • UX guys are out (for this meeting)
  • UR - PDF on stuff;

- little stuff, need to get out of prototype - broadly usable for lots of people? - stuff we have is useful, maybe not in stand alone - maybe within firefox - need more thought on current value - rather than being overwhelmed,

  • QA :

- nhirata to be on vacation from thursday to monday; back tuesday - QA busy with fennec - wait until search is in and the ipad app that stefan plus teh add on - recording the data of web serve that's pushed to server - addon that which makes pancake require no use of sync - just log in with browser id, validates the email - greatly simplifies the login process - can bring in / watch behavior for profile - decouples us from sync versionings - doesn't worry about passwords or addons, etc. - info stored in server; server side is set up

- currently syncs to sync server then to our server - our data (mysql database of urls) - not complicated data structures. just urls - no encryption on stored data (urls) - sent via encryptions

Stuart: - different views of data - the ones we want to do automatically - we can start it from one that starts for you, and then you start building on it and customizing it, your own view, pinview - the default pancake views - search is a view; - currently search is the main thing - whole web; totally about search - when addon; search that looks at stuff you're doing - scratching the surface - doing more over time - only one view currently - UX guys to to take a look at classifying stuff on web - news paper, what are the different sections of it - technologies, business, etc. - does it make sense to divide them like that? - our own views based on that system - ~ 10 ? edit/customizable? - some more mockups - recommended versus pinned? - hybrid (my fav) + recommendations? - real goal to come up with real things - present what user wants 90 % of the time - would like pinnable site - need to think about more - not knowing what the default view should be

- core funcationality out first